chess.com games feel much easier. I easily crush 2000s on this site while lichess 2000 is much harder.
Rating/Feelling diff chesscom vs lichess

chess.com games feel much easier. I easily crush 2000s on this site while lichess 2000 is much harder.
Why do you feel that is? I know that it kinda equals out towards higher ratings, which means the curve is much steeper for lichess.

How so? It's pretty much the only serious one I could find. Do you know better?

I can substract, too But it's not that easy, compare the post I answered to before.
Still doesn't answer the fact that while 500 artificial points of difference for me, games feel much different, still.
Nobody commented on bots, yet....

Dude i just reached 500 on chess.com, IT FELT LIKE FOREVER REACHING 500, in lichess it took me less than 30 mins to reach 500.

Dude i just reached 500 on chess.com, IT FELT LIKE FOREVER REACHING 500, in lichess it took me less than 30 mins to reach 500.
It took me like... a year

> Rating/Feelling diff chesscom vs lichess
The higher the chess skill the more equal ratings are on chess.com and lichess
The lower the chess skill the more difference between ratings on chess.com and lichess (lichess rating is higher)
Lichess has smaller community, probably with bigger fraction of high-skilled players
Lichess has 400 or 600 points (not sure which exactly) as the floor rating while chess.com has 100
There might be also the difference brought by rating systems used on chess.com and lichess (like Glicko-1 and Glicko-2)
Another question (https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/game-threatened-to-stop-before-time-ran-out):
Why do you forum users think that I have much easier matches at 1700+ blitz with lichess compared to getting crushed on 1100-1200 on chesscom?
The best comparison site i found rates 1200 chesscom 'not comparabale with any fide rating' and 1300 with around 1600 elo. lichess 1700+ is supposed to be higher than both. so why chesscom games feel so much harder?
Are there a lot of bots playing?