And we're supposed to believe that? lol Looks pretty fishy to me...
I've redacted my name and peak rating, but hopefully this will help alleviate your disbelief.
Not to undermine your achievement, it's great, but write a book, really? The first thing someone has to wonder is the amount of chess related activities that happened between 2005 and 2011 after which your rating was just trying to catch up. Obviously you weren't accurately rated after every game, you're accurately rated after you plateau.
And of course has to wonder as well about your sub 1000 rating, and how accurate that was. Did you languish for many tournaments/months at sub 1000, climb 800 points in a year, then level off? That's certainly not shown either, and I still have to wonder if a person like this even exists.
I am convinced, especially after hearing the training program.
Even if one wants to say that the starting strenght of pellik was 1400 (which I'm not sure about of course), this is still a MASSIVE achievement.
Heck, most people cannot go from 1800 to 2000 in a single year! I went from 1850 to 2000 in ten months, but that was four years after I had first reached 1800.

And we're supposed to believe that? lol Looks pretty fishy to me...
I've redacted my name and peak rating, but hopefully this will help alleviate your disbelief.
Not to undermine your achievement, it's great, but write a book, really? The first thing someone has to wonder is the amount of chess related activities that happened between 2005 and 2011 after which your rating was just trying to catch up. Obviously you weren't accurately rated after every game, you're accurately rated after you plateau.
And of course has to wonder as well about your sub 1000 rating, and how accurate that was. Did you languish for many tournaments/months at sub 1000, climb 800 points in a year, then level off? That's certainly not shown either, and I still have to wonder if a person like this even exists.