Team Vote Chess Leaderboard
Team | # Matches | Win % | Points |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
326 | 75% | 1,029 |
![]() |
198 | 88% | 807 |
101 | 76% | 334 | |
![]() |
184 | 65% | 300 |
![]() |
66 | 85% | 264 |
![]() |
62 | 87% | 260 |
![]() |
72 | 65% | 205 |
![]() |
86 | 59% | 195 |
Team | # Matches | Win % | Points |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
326 | 75% | 1,029 |
![]() |
198 | 88% | 807 |
101 | 76% | 334 | |
![]() |
184 | 65% | 300 |
![]() |
66 | 85% | 264 |
![]() |
62 | 87% | 260 |
![]() |
72 | 65% | 205 |
![]() |
86 | 59% | 195 |
My Teams are not involved with rush Vote plays, at all!
We aren't playing a Vote Matches below 12 hours per Move! And start doing it just recently, to catch up the cheaters on Vote Competition, who got a hundred points by cheating.
It must be a different Vote Chess Competition, like a Live Chess here, Blitz, and so on!
But it is mostly a Cheating Vote Matches, what they are doing here and now!
They are fishing on small Groups, and catch them out on time, because most New small Group Leaders doesn't know How it Vote System work!
I do not like it!
And this Problem is on injustice, and it will kill a Vote Competition!
Before I persuaded Erik to not award points for 1-move timeouts, teams like The Power of Chess & Fast Players Group put out tons of 10-min-per-move seeks hoping to get easy wins on 1st move timeouts. I still think the vote scoring system needs an overhaul & teams should have ratings rather than just a cummulative score (which tells you nothing about the strength of the team).
Yes! The Vote System on www.chess.com just moving on crunches... , because it not involve any Good Order and Justice!
The Cheaters cut the chickens...
Also, we cannot offer a Conventional Moves here! It can be very useful to force a games, or it can last Year to finish... or Time-Out will occur, somewhere...
Team Vote Chess Seeks