Shameless Bullet Players 🤬

Sort:
Avatar of EvidentRoad

and bullet is a great way to improve your intuition and improve your nerves under pressure

Avatar of anikolay
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have . In short you are a thug . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

Dude, why do you care so much about them? Let them play bullet all they want, it’s their choice.

Avatar of makennasmith123

so what do u guys do on here 

 

Avatar of anikolay
makennasmith123 wrote:

so what do u guys do on here 

 

-_-

Avatar of kinkajouthedragon

bullet is to fast so i play blitz

Avatar of Lightyagami2411
Jenium wrote:

I agree that bullet doesn't have a lot to do with chess. But no need to disrespect people for being good at that. There are people who are good at computer games and some are good at bullet... As long as they don't claim to be great chess players, I don't see the problem...

+1 

Avatar of anikolay
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

bullet needs skill, why do people think bullet just flag, ok i give you a good mouse and good connection, do you promise u get high bullet? ...

fax

Avatar of EvidentRoad
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

bullet needs skill, why do people think bullet just flag, ok i give you a good mouse and good connection, do you promise u get high bullet? ...

truth

Avatar of Lightyagami2411
anikolay wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have . In short you are a thug . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

Dude, why do you care so much about them? Let them play bullet all they want, it’s their choice.

+1

Avatar of sndeww
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

bullet needs skill, why do people think bullet just flag, ok i give you a good mouse and good connection, do you promise u get high bullet? ...

YES PLEASE

Avatar of InsertInterestingNameHere
royalknight101 wrote:

dont talk so high when your not even close to being "decent"

Uh huh

Avatar of Lightyagami2411
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

bullet needs skill, why do people think bullet just flag, ok i give you a good mouse and good connection, do you promise u get high bullet? ...

+1

Avatar of anikolay
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:

dont talk so high when your not even close to being "decent"

Uh huh

Yeah?

Avatar of EvidentRoad

i am decent at least lol

Avatar of InsertInterestingNameHere
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

bullet needs skill, why do people think bullet just flag, ok i give you a good mouse and good connection, do you promise u get high bullet? ...

Agreed

Avatar of LeeEuler

I disagree since

1. what is considered good chess is relative (give Carlsen 30s vs. anywhere here an hour and he wipes the floor with us) and 

2. Bullet is legitimate chess, it isn't just about speed. Otherwise the top bullet players would not also be the top classical players.

3. Large disparity among time controls just means people excel at different things. High bullet low rapid could mean someone is a really intuitive and attacking player but not so good at deep calculation, dealing with different structures, or openings for example. 

Avatar of anikolay
indianplayer06 wrote:

But I don't think bullet req only flagging skills are good sometimes against dangerous flagged: E

“Your comment in a nutshell”

Avatar of damiangarcia99

Top text poopy fart 

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon

I agree with all the points raised here. I agree that bullet needs different skills. And I admit I do not have them as much as some of my peers do . But it still fails to explain the issue. 

You literally can't be a 1000 rated guy in blitz /rapid and be a 1700-1800 in bullet just with the virtue of your so called different skills.

Avatar of anikolay
indianplayer06 wrote:

Ya but u also need good network conn. For bullet

Uh, yeah, but that’s only one aspect of bullet.Â