Shameless Bullet Players 🤬

Sort:
Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon

If the initial argument wasn't sound why was nobody able to refute it yet ?

Avatar of Swills24
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

who dis

I’m simp 4 dat person

Avatar of 4go10_legend

Why does "island" pronounced as "I land"

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
4go10_legend wrote:

Why does "island" pronounced as "I land"

More like “I lend.”

Avatar of duntcare
B1ZMARK wrote:
NicoSancheese wrote:

yu know it also takes skills to play bullet but otherwise I agree

skills for bullet are vastly different from skills for chess, and the lower the bullet rating the more that is true

at my level its sac all your pieces and premove to win

Avatar of sndeww

Ur just bad kid 

Avatar of asdfghkl123456798
little_guinea_pig wrote:
duntcare wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
NicoSancheese wrote:

yu know it also takes skills to play bullet but otherwise I agree

skills for bullet are vastly different from skills for chess, and the lower the bullet rating the more that is true

at my level its sac all your pieces and premove to win

lol

at my level it's "trade like crazy, premove the endgame, try to sneak a pawn past his"

at my level it's spend 0.3 seconds per move in the opening then play random moves if you don't know what to do 

Avatar of asdfghkl123456798

i always blunder in king and pawn endgames when im playing bullet

Avatar of asdfghkl123456798
little_guinea_pig wrote:
Sherlock-Holmes wrote:

In my level its like internet, premoves, sac pieces for a lot fo time, then try getting a better endgame and win it. I usually go trade pieces no matter what and go for endgames.

does that mean playing questionable sacs that make him spend a bit of time, or literally just sacrifice checks to throw off his premove chain?

is sacrificing a piece for  time good?

Avatar of teju17

yes I do that

Avatar of asdfghkl123456798

in 1 min?

Avatar of raka235
Hi
Avatar of Masked_Titan3000
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?

Avatar of chamo2074
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?

It's not about being, it's about bragging about being which is the problem

Avatar of Masked_Titan3000

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Avatar of Masked_Titan3000
chamo2074 wrote:
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?

It's not about being, it's about bragging about being which is the problem

Thanks!

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon

Almost everyone who has played enough bullet games has had a win under 0.01 seconds which is the most satisfying

Avatar of adapro123

hello 

 

Avatar of JackRoach
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Because they have lots of people following them.

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
JackRoach wrote:
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Because they have lots of people following them.

That's true , but there are some that popped out of nowhere