who dis
I’m simp 4 dat person
yu know it also takes skills to play bullet but otherwise I agree
skills for bullet are vastly different from skills for chess, and the lower the bullet rating the more that is true
at my level its sac all your pieces and premove to win
yu know it also takes skills to play bullet but otherwise I agree
skills for bullet are vastly different from skills for chess, and the lower the bullet rating the more that is true
at my level its sac all your pieces and premove to win
lol
at my level it's "trade like crazy, premove the endgame, try to sneak a pawn past his"
at my level it's spend 0.3 seconds per move in the opening then play random moves if you don't know what to do
In my level its like internet, premoves, sac pieces for a lot fo time, then try getting a better endgame and win it. I usually go trade pieces no matter what and go for endgames.
does that mean playing questionable sacs that make him spend a bit of time, or literally just sacrifice checks to throw off his premove chain?
is sacrificing a piece for time good?
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?
It's not about being, it's about bragging about being which is the problem
I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...
But yeah, this forum has a point
I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily.
The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have .
Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.
my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?
It's not about being, it's about bragging about being which is the problem
Thanks!
Almost everyone who has played enough bullet games has had a win under 0.01 seconds which is the most satisfying
If the initial argument wasn't sound why was nobody able to refute it yet ?