Shameless Bullet Players 🤬

Sort:
sndeww

Damn never woulda guessed

25GSchatz22
little_guinea_pig wrote:

ikr

The guinea pigs in your profile picture look like the ones I have

Chessisfunforme

me = big counterexample to the OP tongue.png

winston_weng
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
jaivantjohntitus wrote:
I don't agree with your stupid logic

You are too naive to understand my logic . 

Okay buddy, there’s a reason only one person agrees with you out of all of these people.

As I already mentioned . It's my opinion . And I know not many are gonna agree. But it doesn't change the truth

“The truth” your logic is very flawed.

It's not . You are yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong .

Then I guess the flying spaghetti monster must be real because you have yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong.

JackRoach
winston_weng wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
jaivantjohntitus wrote:
I don't agree with your stupid logic

You are too naive to understand my logic . 

Okay buddy, there’s a reason only one person agrees with you out of all of these people.

As I already mentioned . It's my opinion . And I know not many are gonna agree. But it doesn't change the truth

“The truth” your logic is very flawed.

It's not . You are yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong .

Then I guess the flying spaghetti monster must be real because you have yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong.

The flying spaghetti monster is obviously real.

 

Now write a 10 paragraph essay.

play4fun64
GBTGBA wrote:

I think I’m taking a break from playing bullet after finally reaching to 1500 again after hundreds tries. I will  try play one  rapid a day while watching TV. 

Brilliant Idea. Rapid is best time control for recreation. Can do other things like snacking, social media, TV, etc simultaneously with playing chess.

25GSchatz22
JackRoach wrote:
winston_weng wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
jaivantjohntitus wrote:
I don't agree with your stupid logic

You are too naive to understand my logic . 

Okay buddy, there’s a reason only one person agrees with you out of all of these people.

As I already mentioned . It's my opinion . And I know not many are gonna agree. But it doesn't change the truth

“The truth” your logic is very flawed.

It's not . You are yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong .

Then I guess the flying spaghetti monster must be real because you have yet to put forward a convincing point to prove me wrong.

The flying spaghetti monster is obviously real.

 

Now write a 10 paragraph essay.

You can't make the basis for an argument giving the point that because your argument is yet to be disproved that it is sound. You need to realize the already existing arguments which have already made such existences of spagetti monsters a low probability. However, you can convince me if you provided the right evidence, although this is unlikely.

Anonymous_Dragon

If the initial argument wasn't sound why was nobody able to refute it yet ?

Swills24
HuntressesofArtemis wrote:

who dis

I’m simp 4 dat person

4go10_legend

Why does "island" pronounced as "I land"

AunTheKnight
4go10_legend wrote:

Why does "island" pronounced as "I land"

More like “I lend.”

duntcare
B1ZMARK wrote:
NicoSancheese wrote:

yu know it also takes skills to play bullet but otherwise I agree

skills for bullet are vastly different from skills for chess, and the lower the bullet rating the more that is true

at my level its sac all your pieces and premove to win

sndeww

Ur just bad kid 

asdfghkl123456798
little_guinea_pig wrote:
duntcare wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
NicoSancheese wrote:

yu know it also takes skills to play bullet but otherwise I agree

skills for bullet are vastly different from skills for chess, and the lower the bullet rating the more that is true

at my level its sac all your pieces and premove to win

lol

at my level it's "trade like crazy, premove the endgame, try to sneak a pawn past his"

at my level it's spend 0.3 seconds per move in the opening then play random moves if you don't know what to do 

asdfghkl123456798

i always blunder in king and pawn endgames when im playing bullet

tiny_bullet

lol where i am it is time and skill and when time below 20 sec premove feist XD

asdfghkl123456798
little_guinea_pig wrote:
Sherlock-Holmes wrote:

In my level its like internet, premoves, sac pieces for a lot fo time, then try getting a better endgame and win it. I usually go trade pieces no matter what and go for endgames.

does that mean playing questionable sacs that make him spend a bit of time, or literally just sacrifice checks to throw off his premove chain?

is sacrificing a piece for  time good?

teju17

yes I do that

asdfghkl123456798

in 1 min?

raka235
Hi