Solution for dastardly conduct

Sort:
Avatar of ANOK1

so how many points are gained or lost by

grollox ya fingleberryed my futharking

Avatar of Roo_2_Unlimited
ANOK1 wrote:

so how many points are gained or lost by

grollox ya fingleberryed my futharking

There would be a spectrum from Dick Dastardly up to Peter Perfect on the other end, with varying degrees in between, babe repellent, thoroughly scurrilous, mildly obnoxious, indifferent and cold, friendly, a good sport, a perfect gentleman, babe magnet. etc

Avatar of ANOK1

and is

oh you hameron still considered the worst insult ever

Avatar of Roo_2_Unlimited

I think its up there with planf, heid-the-baw and bawbag

Avatar of MEXIMARTINI
robbie_1969 wrote:
MEXIMARTINI wrote:

Do you play chess on here Robbie? I was going to add some comments to any of your games but there is nothing there? 

Gave me a great idea this thread did.

Hi Meximartini, amigo! I have decided not to play any chess, I cannot stand looking at my games, they fill me with horror and disgust. think kaynight butt naked roaming around Edinburgh on a Saturday night singing Jambo songs, tripple x certificate stuff! 

Still if it gave you a great idea then its all good though!

Well, my first thought is, "I swear kaynight is a woman".  2nd thought: "if she's a woman, how old is she?"  3rd thought: "Would it be cold outside?" 4th thought: "no, kaynight is a guy" 5th thought: "Would it be cold outside?" 6th thought: "WHY AM I THINKING OF KAYNIGHT BEING BUTT-NAKED?!?!"  There you go....

Avatar of ANOK1

now im pretty sure slartibartfarst is ok , the policeman only hit me once when i said it to him

Avatar of Roo_2_Unlimited

ahhhhh the horror , when you are full of dragon soup (cheap wine) cold don't matter, but yeah its freezin here.

Avatar of Roo_2_Unlimited
ANOK1 wrote:

now im pretty sure slartibartfarst is ok , the policeman only hit me once when i said it to him

Aye them were the days when the police used to give you a kicking and say you fell down the stairs.  Still at least its not USA style justice.

Avatar of ANOK1

wow that image is just like hitting your grollox with a cold spoon ,

Avatar of MEXIMARTINI
robbie_1969 wrote:

ahhhhh the horror , when you are full of dragon soup (cheap wine) cold don't matter, but yeah its freezin here.

Soooooo, if a guy, there would be some serious shrivelige, and if a woman, there would be some serious glass cutters on her person.  Cool

 

EGADS MAN!!!  whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?????!!!!!!

Avatar of ANOK1

yeah its such an important milestone in any hooligans life that stairwell

       

Avatar of oregonpatzer
robbie_1969 wrote:
ANOK1 wrote:

so how many points are gained or lost by

grollox ya fingleberryed my futharking

There would be a spectrum from Dick Dastardly up to Peter Perfect on the other end, with varying degrees in between, babe repellent, thoroughly scurrilous, mildly obnoxious, indifferent and cold, friendly, a good sport, a perfect gentleman, babe magnet. etc

Babe magnet here.  Unfortunately for you babes out there, I am taken.  Miz Celeste has got me.  Maybe I will show her this thread. 

Avatar of Ziggy_Zugzwang

null

Avatar of vantangler

I agree with the OPs initiative.  You could simply add a multi language dictionary of words that are generally unfavourably/favorbly received by players, and adjust the opponents rating accordingly, for good/bad conduct.  Further, programmers could tier the words to based on relative offensiveness or compliment, and adjust the rating based on the gravity of the offending remark/compliment given.  This would most certainly award good conduct, while punishing bad conduct.  I for one have been subject to far too much "dastardly conduct" while trying to play this fine sport, and would applaud the implementing of such a fine initiative.

Avatar of ANOK1

that moment when the ten move combo scoobies a piece

"where has my oreo gon"

Avatar of FBloggs
robbie_1969 wrote:
FBloggs wrote:
robbie_1969 wrote:
macer75 wrote:
robbie_1969 wrote:
 

Its not a bad idea if its based on empirical evidence and peer reviewed.  

Really? There have never been any bad ideas that were based on empirical evidence and peer reviewed?

You have an alternative method?

The alternative method is for you to disable chat and block the player instead of expecting the site to set up a "dastardly behavior" peer review process to please one crank out of 20 million members.

nope, this has already been addressed earlier in the thread.  It does not punish rude or inappropriate behavior.  I could block you though if you give me any more of your wash.

You crave attention too much to block anybody.  But maybe blocks should be subject to peer review.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
robbie_1969 wrote:
btickler wrote:

 

The attention seeking "villains" (ironically mentioned by one of their own). . . .

The idea of actually modifying ratings this way is exaggerated and inappropriate, of course, as the OP knew full well when he posted this trolling thread.  

Gee that's bitter  

 

Actually i don't think i have ever sent anyone an abusive text, before, during or after a game. I have publicly scourged some windbags though who were fully deserving of it.

A narcissist always remembers everything as a victory... and ergo, bitterness is in the eyes of the beholder.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
batgirl wrote:

Well, accusations are too often invented or exaggerated while compliments are usually true. I'd rather use probable truth as a basis.

Touche'...I like to base my opinions on past observations happy.png.

Avatar of Roo_2_Unlimited
FBloggs wrote:
robbie_1969 wrote:
FBloggs wrote:
robbie_1969 wrote:
macer75 wrote:
robbie_1969 wrote:
 

Its not a bad idea if its based on empirical evidence and peer reviewed.  

Really? There have never been any bad ideas that were based on empirical evidence and peer reviewed?

You have an alternative method?

The alternative method is for you to disable chat and block the player instead of expecting the site to set up a "dastardly behavior" peer review process to please one crank out of 20 million members.

nope, this has already been addressed earlier in the thread.  It does not punish rude or inappropriate behavior.  I could block you though if you give me any more of your wash.

You crave attention too much to block anybody.  But maybe blocks should be subject to peer review.

another one bites the dust.

Avatar of Roo_2_Unlimited
btickler wrote:
robbie_1969 wrote:
btickler wrote:

 

The attention seeking "villains" (ironically mentioned by one of their own). . . .

The idea of actually modifying ratings this way is exaggerated and inappropriate, of course, as the OP knew full well when he posted this trolling thread.  

Gee that's bitter  

 

Actually i don't think i have ever sent anyone an abusive text, before, during or after a game. I have publicly scourged some windbags though who were fully deserving of it.

A narcissist always remembers everything as a victory... and ergo, bitterness is in the eyes of the beholder.

Gee you seem to be living in a room full of mirrors.  Ironic all things considered.  Your proclivity for a singular belief in naught but your own propaganda is what gave you away and here you are bitchin about others like some real housewife of chess dot come (my apologizes to actual housewives everywhere)