thanks !
SSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sort:
Nov 6, 2013
0
#43
SebLeb0210 wrote:
So, if I want an interesting game that follows ''go big or go home" I chose D4 because there alot of choices in it.
like this :
and for a straightforward game I like E4 better but you need to study the player enough to play it
"
"go big or letsgohome" am i right haahah i crack myself up
SebLeb0210 wrote:
I chose D4 because there alot of choices in it.
That´s what I hate about 1.e4, every subsequent move is forced.
I like to start with h3.
Oh is this it? I'll make sure to say things soon. Just give me a topic and I'll get right on it, or give me a game and analyze it, or whatever.
See ya!
I would play e4 for the fried liver attack against a noob (I don't get to play with strong folks because I have no friends to play with here) But my favorite would be c4, english opening, and I would definitely choose it over the Reti, because in the Reti you can't transpose into english and fall into a constricted/closed pawn game if your opponent plays d4. I don't really play gambits because I don't do a lot of risk.
SebLeb0210 wrote:
So, if I want an interesting game that follows ''go big or go home" I chose D4 because there alot of choices in it.
like this :
and for a straightforward game I like E4 better but you need to study the player enough to play it
It does look winning for white, but only because black played badly, or rather very passively, if black was a good player he will either fight for some central control and bring out his pieces early in the game, because black playing passively could lead white to take initiative or launch an early attack and black would be behind.
Say if black played 2...d5 white would probably play 3.Nc3 and black 3...Nf6, which makes it a little harder for white to have his desired center control.
Now, following what I've said (on the d4) black could play 5...d5 instead of Nc6, in which case after 6.a3 black retreats 6...Be7, which could lead to 7.cxd5 Nxd5, which can lead to a normal game.
I have a bad habit, I just can't stop horsing around... 
Anyway letsgohome,
I'll tell you a secret, and I don't think this is much of a secret at all. I think ahead. When I'm about to make a move, I anticipate my opponent's next move, and my reply after that, and his reply after that. And if the result will be bad, I look for another. Tactics. I try to get all my pieces to do its best on the board, and anticipating my opponent's next move. And if I know that his next move is forced, I take the initiative, and win!! Always looking for the best move. Because remember:
"When you see a good move look for a better one!"
Nov 22, 2013
0
#52
TheR-tist wrote:
SebLeb0210 wrote:
So, if I want an interesting game that follows ''go big or go home" I chose D4 because there alot of choices in it.
like this :
and for a straightforward game I like E4 better but you need to study the player enough to play it
It does look winning for white, but only because black played badly, or rather very passively, if black was a good player he will either fight for some central control and bring out his pieces early in the game, because black playing passively could lead white to take initiative or launch an early attack and black would be behind.
Say if black played 2...d5 white would probably play 3.Nc3 and black 3...Nf6, which makes it a little harder for white to have his desired center control.
Now, following what I've said (on the d4) black could play 5...d5 instead of Nc6, in which case after 6.a3 black retreats 6...Be7, which could lead to 7.cxd5 Nxd5, which can lead to a normal game.
Well thats why I onlly play it with rather less experienced chess players.
Interesting, quite interesting