stalemate is unfair

Sort:
Avatar of Laskersnephew

Blitz is chess. A better player than you wouldn't have blundered into it. Get better

Avatar of tweetytwo

roll eyes u seem so stupid  get over with it that player who win in stalemate in blitz dont deserve it and even in rapid they dont the stalemate is illogical and stupid as u f off now 

Avatar of Stargazer1633
tweetytwo wrote:

stalemate is unfair

 

Life is unfair. Stalemate is probably the least of your problems

Avatar of IpswichMatt
tweetytwo wrote:

i dont know how old you are  Ipswichmatt i hope you be old enough to wittness illogical stalemate thingy in  chess changed  im sure it will change with time as many higher rated ppl agree with me also GMs maybe then u could play with lower rated players with that rule  

No problem. Happy to help!

Avatar of tweetytwo
Stargazer1633 wrote:
tweetytwo wrote:
stalemate is unfair

 

Life is unfair. Stalemate is probably the least of your problems

dont change the fact its a stupid rule that  should be changed as stupid as ppl who worship it

Avatar of Stargazer1633

How? Is your rival turn but he cannot move anywhere, and is not your turn to move, either. The game is stale, hence the name.

You can solve this pressing the Chess federation to add the new piece, the cow, to the game.

Avatar of tweetytwo

chess is war game two armies battles i killed all the armies yet i havent won against that country cause the king is hiding ?!?!?! what kind of logic is that stalemate and having no peices in the board used to be an auto win and it is an AUTO win cAUSE ITS A WAR GAME IT MAKES MORE SENSE 

Avatar of Stargazer1633

You don't kill pieces, just capture them. In Japan and in Crazyhouse they even come back. As for your logic, the other king can't move and is not your turn. Consider it Gameplay and Story segregation.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GameplayAndStorySegregation

Avatar of Laskersnephew

"chess is war game two armies battles" this was somewhat true 600 years ago, but chess quit being a simulation of war and became an important game in its own right in the 1400's if not earlier. 

Avatar of AyushBlundersAgain
tweetytwo wrote:

chess is war game two armies battles i killed all the armies yet i havent won against that country cause the king is hiding ?!?!?! what kind of logic is that stalemate and having no peices in the board used to be an auto win and it is an AUTO win cAUSE ITS A WAR GAME IT MAKES MORE SENSE 

Evan drawn king and pawn against king endings where the lone king has opposition? That should be a win? It's your fault that you made a erratic move that led to a draw instead of a win, and in ways your opponent was right.

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
IpswichMatt wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:

it is a win till fide changed the rules IM glad ur laughing at lame jokes cause im way smarter to waste my time on jokes and no maybe for u chess is for fun for me is to win and actually some ppl dont deserve to win  for ur own information u seem like a d*umb cu*nt ur self 

I'm sorry but I cant respond if I dont know what you are saying. Can anyone translate this into English?

I'll have a go...

"It was a win until FIDE changed the rules! I'm glad you're laughing at lame jokes - I am far too intelligent to waste time on humour, despite walking into a stalemate. And NO! Maybe for you chess is fun but I play to win! Some people don't deserve to win, and by the way you seem to be something of a silly-billy"

How's that?!

lol. Thank you. 

Avatar of Stargazer1633

"I am far too intelligent to waste time on humour"

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/funny-people-are-also-more-intelligent-according-to-new-research


Avatar of Asparagusic_acids

Checkmate for black.

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

Black to play and win.

Avatar of Asparagusic_acids
lfPatriotGames wrote:

Black to play and win.

Black to play and win.

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

I can only imagine the names he would come up for people who think that's a sketchy idea. Illegal position by the way, but the point is well taken.

Avatar of Capabotvikhine
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   The OP has a rating of 1500 and he's been here since 2015...... I think you're all being bamboozled by a troll....

Yes, tweetybird is an attention seeking horse with a very tiny bishop pair. 

Avatar of tweetytwo
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   The OP has a rating of 1500 and he's been here since 2015...... I think you're all being bamboozled by a troll....

HOW IS HAVING 1500 AND BEING SINCE 2015 MAKES ME A TROLL !?!   

POINT MAKING FOR THE LAME PHOTOS ABOVE   ITS UNDERSTOOD WHEN U HAVE ONE PAWN AND U CANT PROMOTE IT ITS A DRAW  BUT WE ALL KNOW IM TALKING ABOUT HAVING MULTIPLE PEICES  U PPL ARGUE WITH COMMON SENSE  CHESS ALREADY IS CONSIDERED A WAR GAME  AND STILL I SEE SOME LAME STUPID PPL HERE ARGUING ABOUT IT WHAT A BUNCH OF RETARDS

Avatar of IpswichMatt
tweetytwo wrote:

 ITS UNDERSTOOD WHEN U HAVE ONE PAWN AND U CANT PROMOTE IT ITS A DRAW 

Wouldn’t be though would it? I think that (in amongst all the name calling and shouting) you’re suggesting that the stalemated player should lose, right? If so, then a king and pawn v king ending will always be a win for the K+P so long as the king protects the pawn

Avatar of Capabotvikhine
tweetytwo wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   The OP has a rating of 1500 and he's been here since 2015...... I think you're all being bamboozled by a troll....

HOW IS HAVING 1500 AND BEING SINCE 2015 MAKES ME A TROLL !?!   

POINT MAKING FOR THE LAME PHOTOS ABOVE   ITS UNDERSTOOD WHEN U HAVE ONE PAWN AND U CANT PROMOTE IT ITS A DRAW  BUT WE ALL KNOW IM TALKING ABOUT HAVING MULTIPLE PEICES  U PPL ARGUE WITH COMMON SENSE  CHESS ALREADY IS CONSIDERED A WAR GAME  AND STILL I SEE SOME LAME STUPID PPL HERE ARGUING ABOUT IT WHAT A BUNCH OF RETARDS

I think you should look into getting some WD-40. Your caps lock seems to be stuck.