roll eyes u seem so stupid get over with it that player who win in stalemate in blitz dont deserve it and even in rapid they dont the stalemate is illogical and stupid as u f off now
stalemate is unfair

stalemate is unfair
Life is unfair. Stalemate is probably the least of your problems

i dont know how old you are Ipswichmatt i hope you be old enough to wittness illogical stalemate thingy in chess changed im sure it will change with time as many higher rated ppl agree with me also GMs maybe then u could play with lower rated players with that rule
No problem. Happy to help!

Life is unfair. Stalemate is probably the least of your problems
dont change the fact its a stupid rule that should be changed as stupid as ppl who worship it

How? Is your rival turn but he cannot move anywhere, and is not your turn to move, either. The game is stale, hence the name.
You can solve this pressing the Chess federation to add the new piece, the cow, to the game.

chess is war game two armies battles i killed all the armies yet i havent won against that country cause the king is hiding ?!?!?! what kind of logic is that stalemate and having no peices in the board used to be an auto win and it is an AUTO win cAUSE ITS A WAR GAME IT MAKES MORE SENSE

You don't kill pieces, just capture them. In Japan and in Crazyhouse they even come back. As for your logic, the other king can't move and is not your turn. Consider it Gameplay and Story segregation.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GameplayAndStorySegregation
"chess is war game two armies battles" this was somewhat true 600 years ago, but chess quit being a simulation of war and became an important game in its own right in the 1400's if not earlier.
chess is war game two armies battles i killed all the armies yet i havent won against that country cause the king is hiding ?!?!?! what kind of logic is that stalemate and having no peices in the board used to be an auto win and it is an AUTO win cAUSE ITS A WAR GAME IT MAKES MORE SENSE
Evan drawn king and pawn against king endings where the lone king has opposition? That should be a win? It's your fault that you made a erratic move that led to a draw instead of a win, and in ways your opponent was right.

it is a win till fide changed the rules IM glad ur laughing at lame jokes cause im way smarter to waste my time on jokes and no maybe for u chess is for fun for me is to win and actually some ppl dont deserve to win for ur own information u seem like a d*umb cu*nt ur self
I'm sorry but I cant respond if I dont know what you are saying. Can anyone translate this into English?
I'll have a go...
"It was a win until FIDE changed the rules! I'm glad you're laughing at lame jokes - I am far too intelligent to waste time on humour, despite walking into a stalemate. And NO! Maybe for you chess is fun but I play to win! Some people don't deserve to win, and by the way you seem to be something of a silly-billy"
How's that?!
lol. Thank you.

"I am far too intelligent to waste time on humour"
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/funny-people-are-also-more-intelligent-according-to-new-research

I can only imagine the names he would come up for people who think that's a sketchy idea. Illegal position by the way, but the point is well taken.

The OP has a rating of 1500 and he's been here since 2015...... I think you're all being bamboozled by a troll....
Yes, tweetybird is an attention seeking horse with a very tiny bishop pair.

The OP has a rating of 1500 and he's been here since 2015...... I think you're all being bamboozled by a troll....
HOW IS HAVING 1500 AND BEING SINCE 2015 MAKES ME A TROLL !?!
POINT MAKING FOR THE LAME PHOTOS ABOVE ITS UNDERSTOOD WHEN U HAVE ONE PAWN AND U CANT PROMOTE IT ITS A DRAW BUT WE ALL KNOW IM TALKING ABOUT HAVING MULTIPLE PEICES U PPL ARGUE WITH COMMON SENSE CHESS ALREADY IS CONSIDERED A WAR GAME AND STILL I SEE SOME LAME STUPID PPL HERE ARGUING ABOUT IT WHAT A BUNCH OF RETARDS

ITS UNDERSTOOD WHEN U HAVE ONE PAWN AND U CANT PROMOTE IT ITS A DRAW
Wouldn’t be though would it? I think that (in amongst all the name calling and shouting) you’re suggesting that the stalemated player should lose, right? If so, then a king and pawn v king ending will always be a win for the K+P so long as the king protects the pawn

The OP has a rating of 1500 and he's been here since 2015...... I think you're all being bamboozled by a troll....
HOW IS HAVING 1500 AND BEING SINCE 2015 MAKES ME A TROLL !?!
POINT MAKING FOR THE LAME PHOTOS ABOVE ITS UNDERSTOOD WHEN U HAVE ONE PAWN AND U CANT PROMOTE IT ITS A DRAW BUT WE ALL KNOW IM TALKING ABOUT HAVING MULTIPLE PEICES U PPL ARGUE WITH COMMON SENSE CHESS ALREADY IS CONSIDERED A WAR GAME AND STILL I SEE SOME LAME STUPID PPL HERE ARGUING ABOUT IT WHAT A BUNCH OF RETARDS
I think you should look into getting some WD-40. Your caps lock seems to be stuck.
Blitz is chess. A better player than you wouldn't have blundered into it. Get better