I started this thread 700 posts ago... havent checked it for months and just by chance I saw it now again...
The thing that strikes me.... is the number of people (that play chess -- a game of intellect) commenting with utterly idiotic logic and very primitive thinking level. If these people are at such a low level, why on earth did they pick chess of all things as a hobby? (Then again, they are stupid, so maybe its not surprising after all)
To be honest with the number of plebs in the world, Im surprised civilization is where it is .... but then again, its a handful of geniuses only that make the progress in each epoch.. which the plebs then proceed to leech off in entitled fashion.
"he must have drawn a won position, now he is crying about it"
and other such witty one liners (also note how often these comments reoccur, its amazing)... even though there is a clearly thought out and reasoned long post on the 1st page.
This kind of reasoning is actually a reflection of the person typing such things... he is (in his primitive way) projecting what he does in his experience.. and thinks everyone else reasons like him. (this is a lack of "theory of mind" most childern aquire this level by around age 5)
Throughout the 700 odd posts I have counted on my hand only 5 or so posters who replied with well thought out and insightful comments... its sad sad reality.
I, for one, am in awe of your intellect. Please don't stop with your opinion on stalemate.
What makes you happy?
What makes you sad?
What do you want to change about the world?
What are your opinions about arts and literature?
I agree, I have always thought capturing the king makes more sense.
Have you ever tried explaining checkmate to a 3 year old? "Well, you get the king in a position so he cannot avoid being taken, but you never actually take the king, but stop one move before..."
It is rather silly. Yes, this is the one chess rule I would like to see changed. If your opponent misses the capture, well then he should pay better attention.