orly?

Chess is a Crap Racist SPORT.

• 

  BronsteinPawn
  #1Feb 3, 2017

  Why the hell do I need to talk in English? 

  Why the hell cant all of you talk in Spanish? 

  Why do I need to read books in English? 

  Where the hell are the Spanish forums? 

  I hate all of you.

How I gained 900 points (daily chess) in less than ONE day

• 

  Cherub_Enjel
  #13 days ago

  No, it wasn't through a new account, or by playing against multiple accounts.

  In fact, I did this all cleanly, and abiding by the chess.com TOS, without any foul play involved. 

  I increased my rating from under 1100 to 2000, having about 800 prior games (and so a very stable rating). 

  The proof:

  

   

  As you can see, I was rated 1100 on May 17th (today), and my rating right now is 2000! You can also click on my profile to see that I did indeed improve by 900 points with an already highly established rating. 

   

  As I wrote in a previous thread, breaking the 1100 barrier is a very very difficult transition in chess, possibly the most difficult transition in terms of chess improvement. 

  When I broke it the first time, I beat an 1800+ player, which was quite surprising for me. 

  So I wondered what would happen if I decreased my rating below 1100, and broke it again?

  So I did that, and then won a game, just to break 1100 again... and this happened!

  I encourage everyone to try my secret. Chess is a very difficult game, and some of the improvements are very very tough to make. The 1100 rating barrier is one of them. What happens when you break 1100 twice though? It's quite incredible.

You're just jealous that I've broken the incredibly difficult 1100 barrier for Chess.com Daily Chess. I noticed that you only have a 1040 rating - those 60 points are going to be the hardest points you'll have ever earned! But work hard, and don't insult others, and maybe you'll have a chance. Also, I post a good amount of analysis on chess, and chess improvement theory, and some opening theory as well. If you were more than a complete beginner who has no clue what you're talking about (I've seen some of your posts regarding chess improvement and skill, and they're totally wrong), you might change your mind. It's OK - everyone starts at the bottom, but saying that *most* of my posts are trolling and insults is just as wrong as the chess advice you give.

The funny thing is, other than 1, 4, and 7 (and in opinion, 1 was quite good at bringing some activity into the forums, which is valuable in itself), the others, not including myself (since I won't judge myself), actually contribute way more than the vast majority of posters here. I've actually learned stuff from them, for one thing, which is much more than I can say for most posters here.

 

ok good to know that you respect my opinion enough to look at a lot of my posts. Btw I am blocking you as of this moment and this wont be an issue from now on.

i told you, i´m weak in many others things probably thanks to my mother right.

 But, what is a dumb?  a Wise man seems a dumb for the sheeps of the matrix .  Also a dumb can be a guy with a low IQ.   A dumb can be your enemy , a dumb can be a rich man addicted to money  or a dumb can be the homeless .

Politics talks like dumbs to reach the heart of the people .  If you have a job and you have to do marketing to send your product,  you wil  talk like a dumb, or you won´t sell anything.   

what´s wrong  with dumbs?   People loves dumbs , Girls loves dumbs,  children love dumbs and clowns,  i love dumbs,   the point is you are offended because of i said  " X is weak"   , if instead i would say " X is strong" you don´t offend.

Therefore,   there is a prejudice  to extermine in your mental programs  , the political correctness

 

 

 

 

excellent analysis! please post more of these in the future.

What's your reason for playing them?  Just level the playing field?  If so, then you'll still EASILY win the game even without your rook, given your 2000 rating against "very weak" opponents (I'm assuming u800).

 

When I used to play with my son, I played without my queen.  Our strength difference wasn't that much, maybe 400 at most; and those games were pretty easily won.  I usually try to set up tactical situations for him to find (e.g. give him a fork opportunity, etc. in the games).  My goals were to give my son a fair chance of winning even when I purposely blunders.

 

So, I think, in your case, if just to level the playing field, you may have to remove a queen and BOTH rooks.  Otherwise, the games probably won't be a challenge for you (and will be too hard for your opponents).

 

 

Such a simple question. Such a heated argument. What does it matter his reason for saying what he said?
This thread says: "Starting a Game without the A1 ROOK" And nobody is talking about that.

Really? Maybe because his "reason" is a big insult?

if he says women are less smart than men because they are women

yes i will have a big problem with that and it is one of the few occasions where i will exercise my right to correct others on the forum

Because it's an obvious troll, in which case if no one replies he'll eventually go away. As a standard community practice it would improve the quality of the forums.

What about macer and ronald cote

I´M N0t troll , i´m introducing a new c0ncept in chess, the handicap.

 

 

Chess.com doesn't have handicap

[COMMENT DELETED]

Boy... how did I not find this gem until now?