Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS

Sort:
EndgameEnthusiast2357

Fritz 6 beat my stockfish 8

tipish

stickfish 9 beat Houdini 15-2

Bad_Dobby_Fischer
BronsteinPawn wrote:

I know Stockfish is free, but I am really dissapointed at him. did you just assume his gender?

Appart from overevaluating positions when he is supposedly calculating at 20 ply just to change his evaluation drastically after I make a move on the GUI he sucks at endgames.

Like look at this position, Stockfish is stupid enough to give only a 0.

 
For once I dont think that is a 0.00 at all, I would shout "BLACK MAGIC" if somehow White could drew that thing.
WHITE MAGIC, not BLACK MAGIC
So, is there any engine that actually knows about endgames? If Stockfish cant really evaluate an endgame then he cant analyze anything.
Should I buy Komodo? Does the lizard know about endgames?
Thanks.

some mistakes

 

also, you said stockfish is free, and then say give me my money back

HorribleTomato

1. It's -0.19.

2. Prove it wrong. Play me as black in that position!

HorribleTomato

It's only weaknesses are

1. REALLY long variations (100 moves or so)

2. Fortresses (as does every other computer)

3. Slight positional inaccuracy! (AlphaZero proved it wrong)

4. Not much else.

Ryanzzz
Impossible to win for black but stockfish says its -16

 

AussieMatey

1...Ke3+ 2.Ke1 Rb1#

Gregory3613
SilentKnighte5 wrote:
RookTheElevator wrote:

I love the title of this blog...."

Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS

 


 

 

DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!

If it were a female engine, it would be 200 elo weaker.

Based