📛 STOP! Hanging Piece Syndrome and your rating will rise !

ESP-918

GOSH! 

SO many teachers in here with a rating 1000 lol

DaddyReza

If it was only about not hanging pieces then why did it take you 16000 games to reach this rating, inspite of the fact that you were already around 1900 when you started playing on this account. 

ESP-918
YareYareWawa wrote:
ESP-918 wrote:
YareYareWawa wrote:
ESP-918 wrote:
YareYareWawa wrote:
ESP-918 wrote:

Like seriously, stop hanging your pieces and bring your rating up!

I'm once was told exactly the same thing by another chess.com member. He claimed, that he reached 2200 rating in here, by just stop hanging his pieces and you can do too. First I didn't believe him, but then I thought to myself why not give it a go and actually try it.

Well here I am 2200+ rating,  easy ....

Now I need someone else higher rated 2300+ player to tell me what to do next to reach 2300+ rating .

Stop hanging pieces to thematic 3 and 4 move tactics = 2300

Sorry before giving advice in how to reach 2300 rating you MUST be 23hu dred yourself  (in blitz ) .

Then when you want to reach 2500 you want to stop entering worse positions where your opponent gets to ask the questions and can push for something without much risk.  For now,  you want to be solid and take the free stuff,  but later you need to start thinking about Equity and EV.   

Stop spamming!  

You have no right to teach or giving me an advice, once you are higher rated then me in blitz on this site , then no problem,  before that sorry ! My rating is just a begginer rating and if you can't achieve even that, you must be complete NOOB ! So no thank you I don't want to share a wisdom with a noob.

My advice works for FIDE so it should work just fine for chess.com too.  Good luck with it buddy.  Unfollowed

THANKS GOD ! Please unfollow and go away and stop spamming forum with an advice on how to be a world champion or a GM  first get a proper blitz rating in here .

If you are giving an advice how to reach 2500 , then be 2500 yourself first . If you are giving an advice on how to reach 2000 rating in here , then be a 2000 yourself first. If you are giving an advice how to reach 1500 hundred in here , then be 1500 yourself first etc.......

Other ways it's just BLA BLA BLA BLA and nothing else and spamming 

 

ESP-918
DaddyReza wrote:

If it was only about not hanging pieces then why did it take you 16000 games to reach this rating, inspite of the fact that you were already around 1900 when you started playing on this account. 

Around 1900 hundred when I started playing o this site?  Lol I never were. When I started playing on this site I was a total noob and now I'm just a begginer.

Does it matter much how many games you've played?  So people played more then 16000 games and still around 13 hundred rating and STILL hanging pieces SO?  What I did was just playing for fun without knowing much, but then one of the members told me a secret and he RISED his rating up to 22 hundred in no time, so he shared his wisdom and told me it's very achievable if you stop hanging your pieces.

I didn't listen to him and continue playing chess and my rating was low , but then I thought why not just give it a go and believe him and try if he did it I can too and here I am . Easy 

2200 rating in blitz is just a begginer strength, so shouldn't be hard to achieve, especially many players saying that it's not real rating and it's not that hard to achieve it in blitz,  not like rapid or daily.

DaddyReza
ESP-918 wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:

If it was only about not hanging pieces then why did it take you 16000 games to reach this rating, inspite of the fact that you were already around 1900 when you started playing on this account. 

Around 1900 hundred when I started playing o this site?  Lol I never were. When I started playing on this site I was a total noob and now I'm just a begginer.

Does it matter much how many games you've played?  So people played more then 16000 games and still around 13 hundred rating and STILL hanging pieces SO?  What I did was just playing for fun without knowing much, but then one of the members told me a secret and he RISED his rating up to 22 hundred in no time, so he shared his wisdom and told me it's very achievable if you stop hanging your pieces.

I didn't listen to him and continue playing chess and my rating was low , but then I thought why not just give it a go and believe him and try if he did it I can too and here I am . Easy 

2200 rating in blitz is just a begginer strength, so shouldn't be hard to achieve, especially many players saying that it's not real rating and it's not that hard to achieve it in blitz,  not like rapid or daily.

It's not that one format is easier than the other. The rapid pool is easier or similar to blitz till around 1600 after that it has a lot of cheaters. Daily has a lot of cheaters and the pool of players is also much weaker IMO. Regarding 2200 being a beginner rating, it's a lie, especially coming from someone who took 16000 games to reach that rating. I checked your archives and you reached a rating of over 1900 after you started playing rated games, around September 2016 and you opened your account in August, so don't lie about that. 

DaddyReza
YareYareWawa wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:

It's not that it's one format is easier than the other. The rapid pool is easier or similar to blitz till around 1600 after that it has a lot of cheaters. Daily has a lot of cheaters and the pool of players is also much weaker IMO. Regarding 2200 being a beginner rating is a lie, especially coming from someone who took 16000 games to reach that rating. I checked your archives and you reached a rating of over 1900 after you started playing rated games, around September 2016 and you opened your account in August, so don't lie about that. 

Do you have evidence of cheaters in daily or blitz formats?  I believe chess.com has anticheat so having cheaters actually play seems impossible.  One of my former opponents was closed for fair play super fast and everyone else going up seems a little bit weak,  and supposed cheaters would seem STRONGER,  wouldn't they?   

They have cheat detection but they can't stop cheaters from coming back. It's much easier to cheat in daily and rapid without using a bot, so it's my observation that they have more cheaters.

ESP-918
DaddyReza wrote:
ESP-918 wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:

If it was only about not hanging pieces then why did it take you 16000 games to reach this rating, inspite of the fact that you were already around 1900 when you started playing on this account. 

Around 1900 hundred when I started playing o this site?  Lol I never were. When I started playing on this site I was a total noob and now I'm just a begginer.

Does it matter much how many games you've played?  So people played more then 16000 games and still around 13 hundred rating and STILL hanging pieces SO?  What I did was just playing for fun without knowing much, but then one of the members told me a secret and he RISED his rating up to 22 hundred in no time, so he shared his wisdom and told me it's very achievable if you stop hanging your pieces.

I didn't listen to him and continue playing chess and my rating was low , but then I thought why not just give it a go and believe him and try if he did it I can too and here I am . Easy 

2200 rating in blitz is just a begginer strength, so shouldn't be hard to achieve, especially many players saying that it's not real rating and it's not that hard to achieve it in blitz,  not like rapid or daily.

It's not that one format is easier than the other. The rapid pool is easier or similar to blitz till around 1600 after that it has a lot of cheaters. Daily has a lot of cheaters and the pool of players is also much weaker IMO. Regarding 2200 being a beginner rating, it's a lie, especially coming from someone who took 16000 games to reach that rating. I checked your archives and you reached a rating of over 1900 after you started playing rated games, around September 2016 and you opened your account in August, so don't lie about that. 

 

Regarding 2200 being a beginner rating, it's a lie, especially coming from someone who took 16000 games to reach that rating. I checked your archives and you reached a rating of over 1900 after you started playing rated games, around September 2016 and you opened your account in August, so don't lie about that. 

 

Why are you do concerned about 16000 games?  I can create new account now play just 10 games and reach probably 2300+ rating , so ?  Does it still mtater how many games I've played? 

Regards 1900 rating you can be too ! Just create a new account in here it will give you a rating of 1800 chess.com it self win one or two games and you are 1900 rated player, so ?  Does it really mean you are 1900 player? 

DaddyReza
ESP-918 wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:
ESP-918 wrote:
DaddyReza wrote:

If it was only about not hanging pieces then why did it take you 16000 games to reach this rating, inspite of the fact that you were already around 1900 when you started playing on this account. 

Around 1900 hundred when I started playing o this site?  Lol I never were. When I started playing on this site I was a total noob and now I'm just a begginer.

Does it matter much how many games you've played?  So people played more then 16000 games and still around 13 hundred rating and STILL hanging pieces SO?  What I did was just playing for fun without knowing much, but then one of the members told me a secret and he RISED his rating up to 22 hundred in no time, so he shared his wisdom and told me it's very achievable if you stop hanging your pieces.

I didn't listen to him and continue playing chess and my rating was low , but then I thought why not just give it a go and believe him and try if he did it I can too and here I am . Easy 

2200 rating in blitz is just a begginer strength, so shouldn't be hard to achieve, especially many players saying that it's not real rating and it's not that hard to achieve it in blitz,  not like rapid or daily.

It's not that one format is easier than the other. The rapid pool is easier or similar to blitz till around 1600 after that it has a lot of cheaters. Daily has a lot of cheaters and the pool of players is also much weaker IMO. Regarding 2200 being a beginner rating, it's a lie, especially coming from someone who took 16000 games to reach that rating. I checked your archives and you reached a rating of over 1900 after you started playing rated games, around September 2016 and you opened your account in August, so don't lie about that. 

 

Regarding 2200 being a beginner rating, it's a lie, especially coming from someone who took 16000 games to reach that rating. I checked your archives and you reached a rating of over 1900 after you started playing rated games, around September 2016 and you opened your account in August, so don't lie about that. 

 

Why are you do concerned about 16000 games?  I can create new account now play just 10 games and reach probably 2300+ rating , so ?  Does it still mtater how many games I've played? 

Regards 1900 rating you can be too ! Just create a new account in here it will give you a rating of 1800 chess.com it self win one or two games and you are 1900 rated player, so ?  Does it really mean you are 1900 player? 

We know for a fact that it took you at least 16000 games to reach this rating after you were already 1800-1900 strength. You might have played even more games on other accounts or OTB . So don't tell us that it's as easy as not hanging pieces, when it took you so much time to do the same. A quick glance at archives shows that you were a 1800-1900 player after your glicko Rd had settled down.