Stop the witch hunt for Hans Niemann! - Chess Forums - Page 3

idilis

Sep 6, 2022

0

#41

Riverlandjack wrote:

idilis schreef:

Riverlandjack wrote:

BUTTER BOY DON'T IGNORE ME.

Wasn't that the point of the block?

No. It's about R and N words.

igNoRe?

PierreCambronne

Sep 6, 2022

0

#42

DreamscapeHorizons a écrit :

Sinquefield Cup Tournament

Hans Moke Niemann 3/4 (+2 -0 =2) [games] Wesley So 2.5/4 (+1 -0 =3) [games] Ian Nepomniachtchi 2/4 (+1 -1 =2) [games] Fabiano Caruana 2/4 (+1 -1 =2) [games] Alireza Firouzja 2/4 (+1 -1 =2) [games] Dominguez Perez 2/4 (+0 -0 =4) [games] Vachier-Lagrave 1.5/4 (+0 -1 =3) [games] Levon Aronian 1.5/4 (+0 -1 =3) [games] Magnus Carlsen 1.5/3 (+1 -1 =1) [games] Mamedyarov 1/3 (+0 -1 =2) [games]

What're y'alls thoughts? Imagine if Hans finished 1st, that'd be wild. There'd be all kinds of crazy threads popping up everywhere there's chess discussions.

Update. This is yesterday's result. Round 5 is done and Hans is still in clear 1st with 3.5 points. I dont know why chessgames.com is over a day behind, it remindsme of a Goichberg tournament. .

Have you looked at the actual table?

Wits-end

Sep 6, 2022

0

#43

lfPatriotGames wrote:

NervesofButter wrote:

Sorry....Lack of self control.

Normally I would agree with you. But after the sandwich I feel much better. So back to the witch-hunt.

Woah, did someone mention food? Will there be snacks?

Riverlandjack

Sep 6, 2022

0

#44

idilis schreef:

Riverlandjack wrote:

idilis schreef:

Riverlandjack wrote:

BUTTER BOY DON'T IGNORE ME.

Wasn't that the point of the block?

No. It's about R and N words.

igNoRe?

You better play some daily games with BUTTER BOY.

SHOW ME A REAL FLAG.

Marie-AnneLiz

Sep 6, 2022

0

#45

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJZuT-_kij0

Hans say at 16 min when he cheated at chess.com.

ChesswithGautham

Sep 6, 2022

0

#46

So if everyone’s butter boy are you bread boy

Riverlandjack

Sep 6, 2022

0

#47

ChesswithGautham schreef:

So if everyone’s butter boy are you bread boy

Only nervesofbutter is BUTTERBOY.

Drawgood

Sep 6, 2022

0

#48

You seem to think that people here care too much about Hans Niemann. Most people just don’t care.

idilis

Sep 6, 2022

0

#49

Marie-AnneLiz wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJZuT-_kij0

Hans say at 16 min when he cheated at chess.com.

It's almost as if he read up on all the arguments in the threads here 😏

Ziryab

Sep 6, 2022

0

#50

idilis wrote:

CraigIreland wrote:

Is witch-hunting a sport?

A sport needs rules. We need some serious effort and coordination. All Hans on deck. Let Niemann be left behind.

The witch hunt on CSPAN followed rules but proved that standards are dead.

Ziryab

Sep 6, 2022

0

#51

Drawgood wrote:

You seem to think that people here care too much about Hans Niemann. Most people just don’t care.

He’s quite likable.

assassin3752

Sep 6, 2022

0

#52

whats his account?

maangogo

Sep 6, 2022

0

#53

In the game against Magnus are there any questionable moves according to chess,com's algorithm or anyone else's? Can Magnus, Hikaru or chess.com make anything more than the vaguest of insinuations against Hans? If they can, let's hear it, if not shut up and leave the kid alone. Is it really so impossible to think that Magnus just played poorly?

DreamscapeHorizons

Sep 6, 2022

0

#54

PierreCambronne wrote:

Have you looked at the actual table?

I didn't know points were removed from all Carlsen's opponents. And yes, I looked at the actual table on chess24 as well as what chessgames.com had.

Riverlandjack

Sep 6, 2022

0

#55

maangogo schreef:

In the game against Magnus are there any questionable moves according to chess,com's algorithm or anyone else's? Can Magnus, Hikaru or chess.com make anything more than the vaguest of insinuations against Hans? If they can, let's hear it, if not shut up and leave the kid alone. Is it really so impossible to think that Magnus just played poorly?

👍👍👍

LowBudgetDave

Sep 6, 2022

0

#56

When playing over-the-board, there aren't many ways to cheat. Even if someone figures out how to cheat, there are pretty good ways to figure out what they did.

Unless the computer says you were playing computer moves, then you weren't.

xor_eax_eax05

Sep 6, 2022

0

#57

LowBudgetDave wrote:

When playing over-the-board, there aren't many ways to cheat. Even if someone figures out how to cheat, there are pretty good ways to figure out what they did.

Unless the computer says you were playing computer moves, then you weren't.

Even then that's not conclusive proof in case of Super GMs, since they play so well them finding a computer-suggested move is not a conclusive proof they cheated.

Of course if a 1300 FIDE plays 60 games like a computer then it can be regarded as very very likely, lol.

sndeww

Sep 6, 2022

0

#58

NervesofButter wrote:

assassin3752 wrote:

The price of betrayal is much cheaper now.

100% not appropriate joke but I'm going to post this anyways

xor_eax_eax05

Sep 6, 2022

0

#59

Worth it.

awesome1184

Sep 6, 2022

0

#60