Strategy

Sort:
Avatar of CharlesPru
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of waffllemaster

And hard to win if your opponent sees it coming Wink

Avatar of pfren

Also hard to improve, if you think strategy is just that.

Avatar of theoreticalboy

Haven't you heard; strategy doesn't even exist!

Avatar of CharlesPru
waffllemaster wrote:

And hard to win if your opponent sees it coming 


 Most don't.

Avatar of CharlesPru
pfren wrote:

Also hard to improve, if you think strategy is just that.


 Definitely its not only that, but those 2 facets have a tremendous impact on the game

Avatar of erikido23

I wish I got a check every time I discovered something

Avatar of bigryoung

i think nimzowitsch does mention those two things in his introduction

Avatar of easylimbo

strategy is building up tactics. strengthening your position and pieces. if you just do one move threats you're not going to get better.

Avatar of waffllemaster
CharlesPru wrote:
waffllemaster wrote:

And hard to win if your opponent sees it coming


 Most don't.


I agree they're very useful.  But as to how often opponent's will see it coming I think it depends on who you play.  Some people like you find them very handy and so are always looking out for them.

Also now that you've posted this advice maybe even more players will be watching out! Smile

Avatar of momtezt
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of momtezt

There was a good book about chess strategy out about a year ago called 'CHESS STRATEGY FOR CLUB PLAYERS'

In it the author adopts Karpov and Mazukevich's 'line of thinking" that goes something like the following...

1) What is the material balance?

2) Are there any direct threats?

3) How is the safety of both kings?

4) Pawn Structure...a) where are the open lines and diagonals?

                             b) are there any strong squares?

                             c) which pawns are weak?

                             d) who is controlling the center?

                             e) who has more space and where does he have it?

5) Which pieces are active and which are not?

 

Based on the positional judgements of the above you proceed to formulate your plan.

I think it makes good sense but of course executing a good procedure is one thing and falling into your old bad habits is another.

 

my two cents worth...Gavin

Avatar of jillianjack45

moo

Avatar of wowiezowie

Indeed the elements of strategy are vast.  To attempt to boil them down into 2 basic tactical motifs is an insult to the game.  

Avatar of underdog73
momtezt wrote:

There was a good book about chess strategy out about a year ago called 'CHESS STRATEGY FOR CLUB PLAYERS'

In it the author adopts Karpov and Mazukevich's 'line of thinking" that goes something like the following...

1) What is the material balance?

2) Are there any direct threats?

3) How is the safety of both kings?

4) Pawn Structure...a) where are the open lines and diagonals?

                             b) are there any strong squares?

                             c) which pawns are weak?

                             d) who is controlling the center?

                             e) who has more space and where does he have it?

5) Which pieces are active and which are not?

 

Based on the positional judgements of the above you proceed to formulate your plan.

I think it makes good sense but of course executing a good procedure is one thing and falling into your old bad habits is another.

 

my two cents worth...Gavin


How dare you add something of value to the discussion! Can you believe the nerve of this guy?

Avatar of momtezt

My deepest apologies...I'm new here and don't know better.