Stupid draw (-1 points for me)

Sort:
ALI_MAKAVELI
[COMMENT DELETED]
EscherehcsE

Your opponent wasn't cowardly. Perpetual check (three-position repetition) is part of chess. If you want to win, one of the things you must do is prevent the possibility of perpetual check. If you don't, you have only yourself to blame.

u0110001101101000

This is possibly the most common perpetual pattern. Worth remembering OP.

LorenzInvariance

Ali, were you really scared of that passed pawn :P You could have traded the queens and the end-game was an easy win.

Pulpofeira

Yes, you should acknowledge he/she for teaching you such a valuable lesson.

ATJ1968

Someone started abusing me because I couldn't win and only draw through perpetual check. As I see it, half a point is better than nothing. Some people act like spoilt brats sometimes.

ALI_MAKAVELI

I wonder if it ever happened in real chess game at tournaments. I guess black would get slap in the face.

Pulpofeira

Sure, try it. Lots of fun assured.

LorenzInvariance
ALI_MAKAVELI wrote:

I wonder if it ever happened in real chess game at tournaments. I guess black would get slap in the face.

Ali, why did you not trade the queens? Were you scared of a pawn end-game? 

ALI_MAKAVELI

So you all saying if i cant win i should do perpetual check and just draw every single game? Against Kasparov too?

LorenzInvariance
ALI_MAKAVELI wrote:

So you all saying if i cant win i should do perpetual check and just draw every single game? Against Kasparov too?

If you can, sure. Kasparov, Carlsen whoever.

ALI_MAKAVELI

Or simply resign not to play like pu**y!

LorenzInvariance

Ali_Makaveli: See this Karpov vs Kasparov game - Karpov was ahead. Kasparov sacrificed a bishop and a rook to create a perpetual check position:


Ali_Makaveli: Why would anyone resign in a situation where you are unable to force a win?

ATJ1968

Maybe chess isn't for you ?

Dodger111
ALI_MAKAVELI wrote:

I wonder if it ever happened in real chess game at tournaments. I guess black would get slap in the face.

 It happens all the time in tournaments. It's part of the game. You had an easy win and you blew it by not trading queens. 

Pulpofeira
ALI_MAKAVELI escribió:

So you all saying if i cant win i should do perpetual check and just draw every single game? Against Kasparov too?

It won't happen anyway.

u0110001101101000
ALI_MAKAVELI wrote:

I wonder if it ever happened in real chess game at tournaments.

Yes, all the time. It's common knowledge this is a drawing resource, and experienced players both look for it and guard against it.

TigiBorg

Quit chess. Now!!! Cool 
Play tennis. Threre's no draw in that sport! Smile

Pulpofeira
pfren escribió:
Pulpofeira wrote:
ALI_MAKAVELI escribió:

So you all saying if i cant win i should do perpetual check and just draw every single game? Against Kasparov too?

It won't happen anyway.

But it can end with perpetual mate- no?

There are big chances indeed!

corum

I think that was great play by black. It is exactly what I would have played for in that position. I am completely at a loss to explain why players - albeit normally quite weak players - think that this is some sort of problem. It is as if they think the opponent should let them win!!!

When I am losing a game I fight tooth and nail to try to make it hard for the opponent. They may slip up under the pressureven though they have a technically 'won' position. I try to activate any pawns I have to try to see if I can push one all the way. Or look for stalemate positions or perpetual check positions as shown in this great example.