Tate was a greater tactician than Magnus Carlsen

Sort:
King343

Now don't get me wrong

Magnus is obviously the overall stronger/greater player. Magnus is a positional genius, but a sub par tactician

Emory Tate was an incredible tactician, he often defeated GM's rated quite higher than him

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate

King343

anyone?

Laskersnephew

Whichever name you are now using, you as still not worth answering.

Drjive_Mrjeckyl

Greater than the sorcerer and magician Tal. this is a quote from one of the greatest attackers of all time

Image result for tal magician

autobunny
Laskersnephew wrote:

Whichever name you are now using, you as still not worth answering.

good ole @superking500

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-good-is-emory-tate

King343

how are you guys not answering seriously?

JamesColeman

Lol 

batgirl

Nothing new under the sun:

https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/4xuaix/is_it_possible_that_emory_tate_was_a_better/

autobunny
King343 wrote:

how are you guys not answering seriously?

We wonder too

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/is-magnus-really-a-sub-par-tactician

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-is-is-that-emory-tate-never-became-gm

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/sorry-i-dont-believe-there-is-such-thing-as-better-chess-players

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/magnus-true-chess-strength

llamonade
King343 wrote:

Emory Tate was an incredible tactician, he often defeated GM's rated quite higher than him

True, ever since the age of 18 Carlsen has never defeated a GM rated higher than himself.

But maybe you should think about that for a second before comparing Carlsen to IM Tate. lol

llamonade
King343 wrote:

Now don't get me wrong

 

Magnus is obviously the overall stronger/greater player. Magnus is a positional genius, but a sub par tactician

 

Emory Tate was an incredible tactician, he often defeated GM's rated quite higher than him

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate

In the example game, Tate - Braunlich 2001 he sacs a knight to open the e file in a Sicilian and then plays a rook sac on e6.

Sorry, but that's not impressive. Both of those are extremely common.

Sure it looks great to a 1200, but there's a reason this guy was 2400 at his peak. Not at all comparable to the great games of great players.

Amandeep-Inquicksand

it looks great to a 1200.

riddle solved.

autobunny
llamonade wrote:
King343 wrote:

Emory Tate was an incredible tactician, he often defeated GM's rated quite higher than him

True, ever since the age of 18 Carlsen has never defeated a GM rated higher than himself.

But maybe you should think about that for a second before comparing Carlsen to IM Tate. lol

Yes but carlsen is the highest rated now,  so he can't possibly beat higher rates GM.  So Tate is better - he was only stopped by death.   Don't mess with King's logic. 

autobunny
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:

Now pull up Superking500s old threads and you'll see the exact same everything. Lack of logic. Reality and evidence mean nothing. Obsession over the same few players trying to convince everyone math and results don't matter, they're still better it's just something must be wrong with the system, thats why they can't prove it, etc.

Noooooo.  King questions the norms.   We need king.

autobunny
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:

Now pull up Superking500s old threads and you'll see the exact same everything. Lack of logic. Reality and evidence mean nothing. Obsession over the same few players trying to convince everyone math and results don't matter, that they're still better it's just something must be wrong with the system, thats why they can't prove it, etc.

He just kept running in a 50 IQ circle.

yes but he's my hero

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/kotf-forget-kotl

Amandeep-Inquicksand

Tate Tate Tate Tate tetetetetetatetate.

great tune!

https://youtu.be/ykDsmAqExH8

congrandolor

Sure, but Nezhmetdinov was better than both

zborg

Tate was great to watch in the Washington DC area.  His positions were consistently mind-numbingly complicated.  Maybe that's why he collected so many scalps.  Good to see that the USA Armed Forces can still produce excellence in some things, other than killing.

P.S.  -- Tate doesn't rank with ANY of the Super GMs, either today or in the past.  Sorry to Inform.

Jenium

Sure, Magnus is the World Champion because he is just okay in tactics. Come on...

JBabkes

Language is a Tool. This post reminds me of someone using language to describe dry water. After washing you do not have to use a towel to dry your hands lol.