Hahahahahahaaa
Terrible game, excellent CAPS score
Sort:
Checkmate in only FIVE moves???????????????
How did you do this?Â
I will look at your games.
Respect anyhow! You're a very sportive player!! I play with you almost for about 5 years and you never give up the spirit !
you and 2100 lol.You are a noob in chess. Go find another sport
you and 2100 lol.You are a noob in chess. Go find another sport
you and 2100 lol.You are a noob in chess. Go find another sport
Mar 17, 2019
0
#8
It is not nice and also not sportieve to say, sreejevana, or whatever!
Mybee you even don’t know what is he talking about!
Mar 17, 2019
0
#9
Yup, just playing for fun, not for greatness and glory.
This is just one example that the computer analysis might not be accurate. In some other games I've analysed the winner has the lower CAPS score, even with the disadvantage of black, still managed to beat the "better" (according to analysis) white.....
Â
There are lots of problems with the CAPS score. They have largely stopped advertising it much around here, in my opinion for good reason.
Winter_Biking wrote:
I completely goofed up in a recent game, was checkmated in only 5 moves.
However, according to CAPS score I had played nearly like a 2100 rated player!!!
It was 91.19. My opponent's was 98.11
Let's just call it high level of goofing up 😂😂😂😂
You had a high caps score because there were few moves in the game. Let's say if you blundered a lot in the game, and you got checkmated in 26 moves, that would be a different story. You might have 38.16 or something near, as your CAPS score.
Mar 17, 2019
0
#12
Well, as with all software at its early stage it will have bugs.
The idea itself is good, but the outcome so far is not very reliable.
Â
Mar 18, 2019
0
#13
1400136896 wrote:
Winter_Biking wrote:
I completely goofed up in a recent game, was checkmated in only 5 moves.
However, according to CAPS score I had played nearly like a 2100 rated player!!!
It was 91.19. My opponent's was 98.11
Let's just call it high level of goofing up
You had a high caps score because there were few moves in the game. Let's say if you blundered a lot in the game, and you got checkmated in 26 moves, that would be a different story. You might have 38.16 or something near, as your CAPS score.
I agree. In the games I've played I've had a CAPS score of 38 or so, a few times higher, more often lower.
For the most part I believe it's mostly accurate. But as I pointed out, there are times when, in a long game, the winner has the lower CAPS score. Might be he struggles more than necessary to put in mate, after the loser made some early blunders, I don't know. It's at least what the analysis has told me sometimes that I missed a mate, or a mate in 3 or some other goof...
Â
I completely goofed up in a recent game, was checkmated in only 5 moves.
However, according to CAPS score I had played nearly like a 2100 rated player!!!
It was 91.19. My opponent's was 98.11
Let's just call it high level of goofing up 😂😂😂😂