you didn't even read the whole comment which is the further proof that you are the one who's just trying to fighting not understanding the motive
The 20 most important benefits of chess
Sort:
Aug 8, 2025
0
#23
Chess does not increase IQ. there is little or no evidence of cause and effect. It might be true that people with higher IQs are more likely to play chess. There is plenty of research that supports these conclusions.
As for chess giving you confidence, well maybe, if you are successful. Same goes for reducing stress and anxiety.
A lot of the purported cognitive benefits of chess are promoted by people with a vested interest in chess, and also some educators. You will find precious little evidence of cause and effect in the medical and scientific community.
Experts say the best way to improve problem solving skills and the like is to learn a new language and put it to use.
To say the chess prevents dementia is a bit of a stretch. Maybe some of the time, but dementia is a complex medical issue, the experts say that more long term studies are needed, that the evidence is very sketchy at best.
So stop doing it already you won't get anything
Aug 8, 2025
0
#26
honestly i’d advise you not to get into a verbal battle with me i can and will articulate my points with my typically british passive aggressive tone using a well stocked vocabulary, I turn even your simplest comment into a labyrinth of needlessly sesquipedalian rhetoric passive aggressive eloquence and syntactic gymnastics, carefully crafted to highlight your conversational inadequacy so if you want to keep things light? its probably best you steer clear of me? personally i’d prefer to keep it civil but hey its your call? by the way i wont think any less of you if you didnt understand half of that or need to google a few words
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Wishing you all the best But honestly, most of us would prefer if people spoke in their own words and thoughts? instead of outsourcing the whole thing to a Algorithmic mumblebot, thats my last word
She’s still sharing useful info, and you’re busy spreading hate? Even if it’s AI generated, it’s accurate, so what’s the issue? If you don’t like her posts, maybe just scroll past instead of whining. It’s really not that hard. Simple as that 🙂. Don't talk trash about her.
Hey, follow your own advice and if you dont like what I say, scroll past it? easy. Whos spreading hate? Saying AI generated is just parroting stuff everyone could find if they cared to? no big mystery there? want to get better at chess? Use that prompt, let AI spit out the answer for you? My point is if youve got somethingl to say, just say it, dont have AI whisper in your ear? Wheres the actual thought in that? honestly, why did you feel the need to reply? Looking to pick a verbal fight or just bored?
Your argument is full of LOGICAL Fallacies lemme explain,
First thing, You are defending yourself, you flipped my advice back on me, trying to say I'm the one who's pricking the fight. Hypocrisy or tu quoaque which is a book Logical fallacy.
Second thing, Justify your criticism you claim that sharing AI-generated content is unoriginal ("just parroting stuff"), and you are not spreading hate, just being honest. Straw man fallacy in psychology.
Third thing, He’s suggesting that using AI = no thinking, which is false. AI is a tool how someone uses it can show a lot of thought, creativity, and insight. saying it’s all “parroting” ignores the difference between mindless copying and thoughtful curation. It's the False equivalence, That means you lack reasoning and general knowledge.
forth thing, A loaded question “Why did you feel the need to reply? Looking to pick a verbal fight or just bored?”. This is manipulative. You are putting two negative motives in your mouth without proof, forcing me into a corner.
It’s like asking “Have you stopped being toxic yet?” — no good answer. tsk tsk tsk although people use it subconsciously when they got no points to against you that's a sort of mental weakness or maybe you think I'm a fool or a kid.
And 5th thing is Gaslighting, You said "who's spreading hate?” you subtly deny the obvious tone of your own comments, as if you're imagining the negativity. This is manipulative because it makes you question your valid reaction.
there are alot more shallowness in your comments but here is my final reply,
Funny how you're preaching about ‘real thought’ right after ranting over someone else’s post. You say AI is just parroting info, but isn't that what you're doing too? Complaining about content instead of creating anything better yourself. You talk about honesty, but disguise your negativity as 'critique' and call it 'no big deal.' Sounds like you do care, a lot actually. And no, I didn’t reply out of boredom, I just thought someone should hold up a mirror.
about me I'm a psychologist and a criminologist.
Nice! that reply definitely had google gemini working overtime? I commend the effort at outsourcing your cognition LOL now go ahead and try stringing a response together solo? i’ll wait while it slowly collapses under its own convolution
You are not the main character stop watching tv too much kid
Well, what ever it is, AI or not AI, that is not the question. It is mostly true of what you say, just that there is low proof of concept, and we have no sources to act on that. Emotional intelligence is a very complicated trait to understand, so I would love to know where you got the data on that, since that can help us mere chess players to better understand you. (Also it kind of helps knowing that the AI didn't hallucinate if it was made by one)
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Wishing you all the best But honestly, most of us would prefer if people spoke in their own words and thoughts? instead of outsourcing the whole thing to a Algorithmic mumblebot, thats my last word
I think your objection is beside the point. This isn't a game.
You were incorrect to ascribe to Jess hatred as a motive, or to say she ws just whining.
It's cool you don't like the OP feeling insulted, but you insult freely, seemingly unaware of the irony but, more to the point. It seems your concern is more selfish than wss otherwise evident... your motive is now just to refute the idea that you had it all wrong.
best advice: cut your losses, don't just dig a deeper whole
we don't have a large audience
no reason to panic
drop it and move on
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Why would I want to read AI generated stuff? wheres your thoughts?
Looks like you rely on AI a bit too much, no wonder you assume I’m using it too. In criminology, there's a saying that a thief sees everyone around them as thieves.
Ultimate-Pawn124 wrote:
Well, what ever it is, AI or not AI, that is not the question. It is mostly true of what you say, just that there is low proof of concept, and we have no sources to act on that. Emotional intelligence is a very complicated trait to understand, so I would love to know where you got the data on that, since that can help us mere chess players to better understand you. (Also it kind of helps knowing that the AI didn't hallucinate if it was made by one)
This is what is called "blowing smoke" trying to "muddy the water".
None of this is obscure. That's true whether the issue is familiar to you or not.
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Why would I want to read AI generated stuff? wheres your thoughts?
Looks like you rely on AI a bit too much, no wonder you assume I’m using it too. In criminology, there's a saying that a thief sees everyone around them as thieves.
This exemplifies the problem
and will even more so the better AI becomes at mimicking human speech
even now, you can't tell the difference, or so it would seem
but I've known Jesse for a while now
she has no need of AI to write
she's a natural
typos and all (LOL)
It reminds of me when i was 10 years old I used to stupidity question every stupid thing without understanding anything. Haha nostalgic.
Aug 8, 2025
0
#35
One thing I have noticed about AI, it will keep making revisions until you get an answer you like, or maybe tell you what you want to believe. Probably using it will NOT help your problem solving skills. LOL
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Why would I want to read AI generated stuff? wheres your thoughts?
Looks like you rely on AI a bit too much, no wonder you assume I’m using it too. In criminology, there's a saying that a thief sees everyone around them as thieves.
Again, the insults... not exactly a sign of good character,
thedelcai wrote:
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Why would I want to read AI generated stuff? wheres your thoughts?
Looks like you rely on AI a bit too much, no wonder you assume I’m using it too. In criminology, there's a saying that a thief sees everyone around them as thieves.
This exemplifies the problem
and will even more so the better AI becomes at mimicking human speech
even now, you can't tell the difference, or so it would seem
but I've known Jesse for a while now
she has no need of AI to write
she's a natural
typos and all (LOL)
i have studied English for 2 years C2 level. ^^ and i did typos too if you read it clearly
"Teach a wise man and he will be wiser still. Teach a fool and you will only arouse his wrath."
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
thedelcai wrote:
Kitkat-Sharad wrote:
Jess_mc_uk wrote:
Why would I want to read AI generated stuff? wheres your thoughts?
Looks like you rely on AI a bit too much, no wonder you assume I’m using it too. In criminology, there's a saying that a thief sees everyone around them as thieves.
This exemplifies the problem
and will even more so the better AI becomes at mimicking human speech
even now, you can't tell the difference, or so it would seem
but I've known Jesse for a while now
she has no need of AI to write
she's a natural
typos and all (LOL)
i have studied English for 2 years C2 level. ^^ and i did typos too if you read it clearly
Your defensiveness is understandable, but it won't work.
Again, this is of very little conequence and not much needs to be said that has not alresdy been said.
drop it
move on
no one very much cares
Wishing you all the best But honestly, most of us would prefer if people spoke in their own words and thoughts? instead of outsourcing the whole thing to a Algorithmic mumblebot, thats my last word
She’s still sharing useful info, and you’re busy spreading hate? Even if it’s AI generated, it’s accurate, so what’s the issue? If you don’t like her posts, maybe just scroll past instead of whining. It’s really not that hard. Simple as that 🙂. Don't talk trash about her.
Hey, follow your own advice and if you dont like what I say, scroll past it? easy. Whos spreading hate? Saying AI generated is just parroting stuff everyone could find if they cared to? no big mystery there? want to get better at chess? Use that prompt, let AI spit out the answer for you? My point is if youve got somethingl to say, just say it, dont have AI whisper in your ear? Wheres the actual thought in that? honestly, why did you feel the need to reply? Looking to pick a verbal fight or just bored?
Your argument is full of LOGICAL Fallacies lemme explain,
First thing, You are defending yourself, you flipped my advice back on me, trying to say I'm the one who's pricking the fight. Hypocrisy or tu quoaque which is a book Logical fallacy.
Second thing, Justify your criticism you claim that sharing AI-generated content is unoriginal ("just parroting stuff"), and you are not spreading hate, just being honest. Straw man fallacy in psychology.
Third thing, He’s suggesting that using AI = no thinking, which is false. AI is a tool how someone uses it can show a lot of thought, creativity, and insight. saying it’s all “parroting” ignores the difference between mindless copying and thoughtful curation. It's the False equivalence, That means you lack reasoning and general knowledge.
forth thing, A loaded question “Why did you feel the need to reply? Looking to pick a verbal fight or just bored?”. This is manipulative. You are putting two negative motives in your mouth without proof, forcing me into a corner.
It’s like asking “Have you stopped being toxic yet?” — no good answer. tsk tsk tsk although people use it subconsciously when they got no points to against you that's a sort of mental weakness or maybe you think I'm a fool or a kid.
And 5th thing is Gaslighting, You said "who's spreading hate?” you subtly deny the obvious tone of your own comments, as if you're imagining the negativity. This is manipulative because it makes you question your valid reaction.
there are alot more shallowness in your comments but here is my final reply,
Funny how you're preaching about ‘real thought’ right after ranting over someone else’s post. You say AI is just parroting info, but isn't that what you're doing too? Complaining about content instead of creating anything better yourself. You talk about honesty, but disguise your negativity as 'critique' and call it 'no big deal.' Sounds like you do care, a lot actually. And no, I didn’t reply out of boredom, I just thought someone should hold up a mirror.
about me I'm a psychologist and a criminologist.
Nice! that reply definitely had google gemini working overtime? I commend the effort at outsourcing your cognition LOL now go ahead and try stringing a response together solo? i’ll wait while it slowly collapses under its own convolution