The Caro-Kann declared an inaccuracy by chess.com?
Sort:
[COMMENT DELETED]
In hindsight what I'm posting here IS probably well known by the people who use this site... but still, I think this could be an interesting point of discussion.
I noticed the c6=inaccuracy too. I guess the freebie analyzer doesn't hook up to book.
I figured it actually meant to say that -I- was the inaccuracy, but it didn't have the grammatical lexicon to do it.
Um... The retarded computer for free members (like me) calls the Sicilian an inaccuracy, it tells me perhaps better was 1. ..d5!
Cause everyone know the Sicilian and Caro-Khan are mere inaccuracies compared to the Center Counter!
As an actual question, what does it really mean when it says ~2000 strength? Is it just a way of claiming that it's Master level, or are they really just using the same rating system as is used on chess.com?
Yes, it's actually supposed to be spelled Karo-Cann!
Korrect.
Sam97 wrote:
Um... The retarded computer for free members (like me) calls the Sicilian an inaccuracy, it tells me perhaps better was 1. ..d5!
Cause everyone know the Sicilian and Caro-Khan are mere inaccuracies compared to the Center Counter!
Center control is all the computer thinks about ! I mean it is just move 1 and we know the continuation for these lines and we have witnessed good from these lines, the computer is only considering #1 at that point.
I was laughing at this when I saw it earlier when I submitted a game for computer analysis, although today i'm playing like peanuts.
