The Death of cheater_1

Sort:
Jaguarphd

I wasn't doubting you Erik. lol

Just posting that for all to see. Despite this conflict, it was an interesting game. :)

Me10167
erik wrote:

here's the quick of it:

after boasting to no end about being "unmateable" and unbeatable yada yada i gave cheater_1 a chance to prove it - to play a game against all of chess.com. he was giddy like a little girl and thanked me over and over for this opportunity (he loves attention). i thought it was amusing and would be an interesting game for chess.com.

for those of you who followed the game it was a very interesting game. it was dynamic, unbalanced, and enjoyable. then suddenly cheater_1 made a mistake. it was a subtle mistake, but a deadly one that quickly gave him a losing position in what was likely a draw.

after the game he admitted the loss and blamed it on his chess computer that he calls cannibal37 (though i still doubt he had a custom chess engine). in several places he admitted to losing the game and had plenty of excuses, but owned up to it like a man. 

then, a few days ago he comes back and tries to rewrite history by again claiming he has never lost. he also deleted his forum post where he publicly admitted to his loss. this really, really irritated me since i went out of my way to give him the attention he craved and setup a match which he lost fair and square. i considered this a serious insult. so i sent him a message and told him to recant or i would do what many many people have asked me to do - close his account. 

frankly, i didn't expect him to close his account. i was sad to see him do that. i was pretty sure he would just own up to it, or maybe start up a controversial post about how i was bullying him and then the evidence would come out and he would (once again) look like a liar and an idiot. but nope - he went stubborn and did the unexpected - closing his own account. i hadn't even considered this as a option since he is so amazingly self-interested and attention-seeking.

he cut off his nose to spite his own face. a weird decision and not what i would have chosen. but i was tired of having him insult me and all of the players of the first vote chess game with him.

i'll miss cheater_1 a little. he certainly had his followers and did do a good job stirring up some people with brash and wild posts. but i also had to put up with a lot of upset people who demanded i close his account, etc. it was weird to be sticking up for the guy to people who would ask about it. but i did... until he crossed the line.

i wouldn't close someone's account on chess.com just for fun or kicks. i'm not a mean censorship-hungry jerk. the only time i (or chess.com) close accounts is when people break the site rules (cheating, offending, mutliple accounts, etc). cheater_1 broke a special rule that we agreed to when we started the vote chess game - that he would accept the outcome.

tonight when i logged in and saw his account closed i re-opened it but made it inaccessible so that his posts and commentary would live on as an interesting part of chess.com history.

anyway, that's the full story. i'm happy to answer any other questions :)

I forgive you. You did not do anything wrong.


KillaBeez

"Cutting off his own nose to spite his own face."  Yep, that sounds like something cheater_1 would do.

BasicLvrCH8r

"frankly, i didn't expect him to close his account. i was sad to see him do that. i was pretty sure he would just own up to it, or maybe start up a controversial post about how i was bullying him and then the evidence would come out and he would (once again) look like a liar and an idiot. but nope - he went stubborn and did the unexpected - closing his own account. i hadn't even considered this as a option since he is so amazingly self-interested and attention-seeking."

If this is all true, I wonder why he closed his account. His reasoning was that he was being forced. It seems very odd.

"tonight when i logged in and saw his account closed i re-opened it but made it inaccessible so that his posts and commentary would live on as an interesting part of chess.com history."

That is very kind of you. Thank you.

BasicLvrCH8r
victhestick wrote:

Here is a debate I always wanted to have:

     What is more important, air or water?


It depends on one's goal. It one's goal is to live for the longest amount of time possible, then air is more important. If one's goal is a quick and painless death, then water is more necessary. Nothing is important or necessary without parameters.

stats_man

We are here to play chess people!!!

If you want to get wrapped up in drama tune into a soap opera or join a site that caters to such things. Otherwise, go make a move in one of your games and quit clogging the forums with this nonsense.

LATITUDE

No comprendo nada!

From the encarta to all of us.

Plato

V.

Political Theory

The Republic, Plato’s major political work, is concerned with the question of justice and therefore with the questions “what is a just state” and “who is a just individual?”

The ideal state, according to Plato, is composed of three classes. The economic structure of the state is maintained by the merchant class. Security needs are met by the military class, and political leadership is provided by the philosopher-kings. A particular person’s class is determined by an educational process that begins at birth and proceeds until that person has reached the maximum level of education compatible with interest and ability. Those who complete the entire educational process become philosopher-kings. They are the ones whose minds have been so developed that they are able to grasp the Forms and, therefore, to make the wisest decisions. Indeed, Plato’s ideal educational system is primarily structured so as to produce philosopher-kings.

Plato associates the traditional Greek virtues with the class structure of the ideal state. Temperance is the unique virtue of the artisan class; courage is the virtue peculiar to the military class; and wisdom characterizes the rulers. Justice, the fourth virtue, characterizes society as a whole. The just state is one in which each class performs its own function well without infringing on the activities of the other classes.

Plato divides the human soul into three parts: the rational part, the will, and the appetites. The just person is the one in whom the rational element, supported by the will, controls the appetites. An obvious analogy exists here with the threefold class structure of the state, in which the enlightened philosopher-kings, supported by the soldiers, govern the rest of society.

 

kawazaki

cheater-1...cm'on...!READ CAREFULLY THIS MESSAGE::: you still at this site...i know who you are...i know very well who you are...your actual name & you still playing...hmmm...! all over this site i'll following you & i'll never stop till all members will know who you are....VAMPIRESYell;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

SHOW YOUR SELF NOW...YOU ARE ON LINE...I SAW YOUR ACCOUNT:

RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

YOU LOGOUT NOW...!hmmmm...!SO I'M WAITING TILL YOU LOGIN...prove yourself...you are cheating us...? NO...NO AT ALL...WE ARE WAITING & TAKE CARE FROM THIS WORD ( WE )

El_Gremio

que................que......................que?Tongue out

BasicLvrCH8r

¿Por qué preguntas "qué"? Es fácil entender que dice.

Hugh_T_Patterson

More chess, less talk....

Thijs

Wow, some quality chess talk in these topics...

ColdCoffee

Ok, I am completely new to this site and should probably go off into the corner and be quite, but the curiosity is killing me... what is going on here, who is this cheater guy, who is erik, why is cheater dead, what is the vote game, should  I care?

Just curious,
Have a wonderful day :)

kco
ColdCoffee wrote:

Ok, I am completely new to this site and should probably go off into the corner and be quite, but the curiosity is killing me... what is going on here, who is this cheater guy, who is erik, why is cheater dead, what is the vote game, should  I care?

Just curious,
Have a wonderful day :)


 Just go and have another coffee , nothing here for you to worry about except remember erik is the creator/boss of this wonderful website. Have a nice day btw welcome to chess.com.Wink

ColdCoffee
kco wrote:
ColdCoffee wrote:

Ok, I am completely new to this site and should probably go off into the corner and be quite, but the curiosity is killing me... what is going on here, who is this cheater guy, who is erik, why is cheater dead, what is the vote game, should  I care?

Just curious,
Have a wonderful day :)


 Just go and have another coffee , nothing here for you to worry about except remember erik is the creator/boss of this wonderful website. Have a nice day btw welcome to chess.com.


Sounds good to me!

BasicLvrCH8r
ColdCoffee wrote:

Ok, I am completely new to this site and should probably go off into the corner and be quite, but the curiosity is killing me... what is going on here, who is this cheater guy, who is erik, why is cheater dead, what is the vote game, should  I care?

Just curious,
Have a wonderful day :)


This is cheater_1's account. Read his posts to get a good idea of him. He explains his side of the story of getting banned. Read the most recent threads posted by him, and you will be fully educated.

http://www.chess.com/members/view/cheater_1

kco

He didn't get banned he just closed his own account.

Maradonna
Phobetor wrote:

Wow, some quality chess talk in these topics...


 When you clicked on the link leading to the forum topic, 'The death of Cheater_1' were you expecting quality chess talk?

BasicLvrCH8r

Exactly.

shane97

it is just a player and he will be back because he cant handle the presure