fr
The Englund gambit counter finnally

IDK why I posted this forum I just went to analysis and found out my idea doesn't work so I wanted to see what does work and stockfish gave me this I just never thought this would be how allowing them to have a pawn

theres a second one I designed where the idea is you also bring your queen out and actually tell them danger levels and if theygo for the mate attack its white mates on move 14


I like to counter bad gambits so I wanted to know how to almost always win against the englund gambit

though giving back the pawn is an ok idea because the might actually have to give back a pawn to keep the center but stockfishes idea is that you win a pawn and the center

by the way none of this is book and has never been done without people cheating 3 book moves each player that's it there is no YouTube tutorial cuz this is the best way


really rude for no reason at all

though giving back the pawn is an ok idea because the might actually have to give back a pawn to keep the center but stockfishes idea is that you win a pawn and the center
generally I do like to give back the pawn as long as it gives me a safe position and a slight edge. i find that many high level gambit players have way too much theory and experience in their favourite unsound lines
giving back the pawn is the most common continuation in the master database as well

The thing is with gambits is that you have to move a piece or pawn a second time in the opening. So if you try to hold the material, one of three things occurs: first, the side that gambits the pawn or piece can simply develop at near even and if you make an inferior move, seize initiative or advantage by means of a tactic. Second, you open up yourself to trap lines as in the QGA Old Variation where you can win a piece with Qf3. Finally, in many cases, holding the material can lead to complex, sharp play as in the Scotch Gambit. Giving back the material at the right time through development allows White to get back the half move they lost.

So you hate my English fine I'll improve my English, I don't know what's wrong with not using commas, periods, " these things forgot their name, and these ;. Is that the problem?
it just cwazy