The Englund gambit counter finnally

Sort:
KentexplorerchessW

it just cwazy

AGC-Gambit_YT

fr

KentexplorerchessW

IDK why I posted this forum I just went to analysis and found out my idea doesn't work so I wanted to see what does work and stockfish gave me this I just never thought this would be how allowing them to have a pawn

KentexplorerchessW

this was my englund gambit counter before

but it turns out the position is just equal

KentexplorerchessW

theres a second one I designed where the idea is you also bring your queen out and actually tell them danger levels and if theygo for the mate attack its white mates on move 14

Abtectous
Don’t waste your time analyzing all this. Watch a youtube tutorial and move on to something more instructive
RookMindset

I like returning the pawn. Just a very comfortable position with no tricks.

Abtectous
I just like not playing d4. Don’t even have to worry about gambits.
RookMindset

e4 has a lot more goofy gambits

Abtectous
I don’t play e4.
KentexplorerchessW

I like to counter bad gambits so I wanted to know how to almost always win against the englund gambit

KentexplorerchessW

though giving back the pawn is an ok idea because the might actually have to give back a pawn to keep the center but stockfishes idea is that you win a pawn and the center

KentexplorerchessW

by the way none of this is book and has never been done without people cheating 3 book moves each player that's it there is no YouTube tutorial cuz this is the best way

Abtectous
JUST STOP. Your English is terrible, nobody understands what you are saying and I don’t think you do either- get better at chess and then try to teach people!
RookMindset
Abtectous wrote:
JUST STOP. Your English is terrible, nobody understands what you are saying and I don’t think you do either- get better at chess and then try to teach people!

really rude for no reason at all

RookMindset
KentexplorerchessW wrote:

though giving back the pawn is an ok idea because the might actually have to give back a pawn to keep the center but stockfishes idea is that you win a pawn and the center

generally I do like to give back the pawn as long as it gives me a safe position and a slight edge. i find that many high level gambit players have way too much theory and experience in their favourite unsound lines

giving back the pawn is the most common continuation in the master database as well

AGC-Gambit_YT

how did this blow up after I said like one thing lol

playchessordie19

The thing is with gambits is that you have to move a piece or pawn a second time in the opening. So if you try to hold the material, one of three things occurs: first, the side that gambits the pawn or piece can simply develop at near even and if you make an inferior move, seize initiative or advantage by means of a tactic. Second, you open up yourself to trap lines as in the QGA Old Variation where you can win a piece with Qf3. Finally, in many cases, holding the material can lead to complex, sharp play as in the Scotch Gambit. Giving back the material at the right time through development allows White to get back the half move they lost.

KentexplorerchessW
Abtectous wrote:
JUST STOP. Your English is terrible, nobody understands what you are saying and I don’t think you do either- get better at chess and then try to teach people!

So you hate my English fine I'll improve my English, I don't know what's wrong with not using commas, periods, " these things forgot their name, and these ;. Is that the problem?

AGC-Gambit_YT

yep, probably, and also don't use too many commas. You create run-on sentences that way.