Also don't use the word "Caste System" in the way its not supposed to be used.
THE ENPASSANT RULE IS SO DUMB
Sort:
So apparently the two-move rule is not a "special benefit", but balancing it out is?
Also, chess is a game. White moving first is not racist. Pawns being weak have nothing to do with the caste system. This is how degenerated our society has become.
Dec 29, 2020
0
#44
Imadesigirl wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
Am totally agree. Very stupid rule should change it. Pawns cannot having special benefit chumma. Must be equal. Not caste system occur on chessboard.
I have a idea, you can simply leave chess.
Rishabh is not even Kshatriya caste name. Chumma saying.
Oof now these idiots are doing all this nonsense here, I guess they should they should be banned for abuse!
rishabh11great wrote:
Also don't use the word "Caste System" in the way its not supposed to be used.
How else to use it ba. That only na. So then what. It is segregation term it is. That only I am saying. Chumma don't say ba chummma
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
Am totally agree. Very stupid rule should change it. Pawns cannot having special benefit chumma. Must be equal. Not caste system occur on chessboard.
I have a idea, you can simply leave chess.
Rishabh is not even Kshatriya caste name. Chumma saying.
Oof now these idiots are doing all this nonsense here, I guess they should they should be banned for abuse!
Arey Yaar when did I say that you simply copy paste wrong sayings it is. Look above nowhere it is I am saying such kind of remark. Liar man!!
Dec 29, 2020
0
#47
Imadesigirl wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
Am totally agree. Very stupid rule should change it. Pawns cannot having special benefit chumma. Must be equal. Not caste system occur on chessboard.
I have a idea, you can simply leave chess.
Rishabh is not even Kshatriya caste name. Chumma saying.
Oof now these idiots are doing all this nonsense here, I guess they should they should be banned for abuse!
Arey Yaar when did I say that you simply copy paste wrong sayings it is. Look above nowhere it is I am saying such kind of remark. Liar only more lies is coming.
Shut up, deleting comment after its said makes no sense.
TheBlunderPunisher wrote:
So apparently the two-move rule is not a "special benefit", but balancing it out is?
Also, chess is a game. White moving first is not racist. Pawns being weak have nothing to do with the caste system. This is how degenerated our society has become.
Yes totally agree such kind of thing should not occur the chessboard it is
zl0ck wrote:
bruh im only 200 in blitz, im around 800 in in 10 minutes, ive been playing the game for three years, i stand by my word that it makes no sence and it makes me want to pluck my eyeballs out
It's just my amateur opinion, but I don't think the en passant rule is the problem. It could be playing a game that makes you want to pluck your eyeballs out might possibly be the problem.
Imadesigirl wrote:
TheBlunderPunisher wrote:
So apparently the two-move rule is not a "special benefit", but balancing it out is?
Also, chess is a game. White moving first is not racist. Pawns being weak have nothing to do with the caste system. This is how degenerated our society has become.
Yes totally agree such kind of thing should not occur the chessboard it is
r/wooosh
Also, you are the same person claiming to know Dibyendu Barua and openly admitting to using this supposed guanxi to try to influence OTB tournaments.
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
Am totally agree. Very stupid rule should change it. Pawns cannot having special benefit chumma. Must be equal. Not caste system occur on chessboard.
I have a idea, you can simply leave chess.
Rishabh is not even Kshatriya caste name. Chumma saying.
Oof now these idiots are doing all this nonsense here, I guess they should they should be banned for abuse!
Arey Yaar when did I say that you simply copy paste wrong sayings it is. Look above nowhere it is I am saying such kind of remark. Liar only more lies is coming.
Shut up, deleting comment after its said makes no sense.
How you can tell me shut up ba. I won't shut up I have right to speak equal as man
Please stop fighting... even if every person in the world agrees to stop the En-Passant rule, it will still be there.
We're beyond that by now.
TheBlunderPunisher wrote:
Imadesigirl wrote:
TheBlunderPunisher wrote:
So apparently the two-move rule is not a "special benefit", but balancing it out is?
Also, chess is a game. White moving first is not racist. Pawns being weak have nothing to do with the caste system. This is how degenerated our society has become.
Yes totally agree such kind of thing should not occur the chessboard it is
r/wooosh
Also, you are the same person claiming to know Dibyendu Barua and openly admitting to using this supposed guanxi to try to influence OTB tournaments.
I have never played OTB tournament however I am hoping to book board 1 in advance if possible it is.
Dec 29, 2020
0
#55
Enpassant reminds me of football (or soccer, whatever) when one player trips up another one. Almost the same thing.
En passant is a valid move.
The soccer/football maneuver you refer to is a foul.
Not the same thing at all.
Dec 29, 2020
0
#57
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:
You're rated 200. You cant play chess. What gives you the authority to challenge a rule which has been in place for hundreds of years?
So if someone is rated 200 they can't have an opinion?
Dec 29, 2020
0
#59
zl0ck wrote:
YOU GET THE ENEMY PAWN TO GO ONE DOWN AND THEN YOU MOVE 2 UP AND THEN THEY KILL YOU????? BRUH
I usually get mad when someone plays En Passant against me, but when I play En Passant against someone, yes, it's a great rule if I'm winning if that position. En Passant is a bit confusing though but the sole purpose of En Passant is so that it's not inconvenient and the game won't be in a drawish position with a Pawn v. Pawn position. I don't have a side with En Passant because it is already a rule and you could do nothing about it unless they actually change the rules.
Dec 29, 2020
0
#60
JudgeCat wrote:
zl0ck wrote:
YOU GET THE ENEMY PAWN TO GO ONE DOWN AND THEN YOU MOVE 2 UP AND THEN THEY KILL YOU????? BRUH
I usually get mad when someone plays En Passant against me, but when I play En Passant against someone, yes, it's a great rule if I'm winning if that position. En Passant is a bit confusing though but the sole purpose of En Passant is so that it's not inconvenient and the game won't be in a drawish position with Pawn v. Pawn. I don't have a side with En Passant because it is already a rule and you could do nothing about it unless they actually change the rules.
Am totally agree. Very stupid rule should change it. Pawns cannot having special benefit chumma. Must be equal. Not caste system occur on chessboard.
I have a idea, you can simply leave chess.
Why I should leave you only leave na