well. . . . I often see Knight trying to kill Bishop but there is always something covering the bishop. . . . . (EX: Pwan,queen,knight all the others) The it comes to a decision . . . Should I take the bishop by sacrificing the knight???
I like knight alot because it can really do some exchanging by mating your opponent. . . . . .
So should I do it in future like this. . . ??? 0.o
Oh yeah. . . . I used to beat the computer . . at easy level with my crappy stratergy . . . . But now it won't work. . . . It seems like the computer recorded my stratergy. . . . Is that ture 0.o
You don't really sacrifice the knight (they have similar values); the better term is exchange. You exchange them depending on the position; knights are better in closed positions. I don't know if computers now learn the way people learn. I like to see that machine if it exists--artifical intelligence to the max!
you should be able to contact the company that created the chess game you are playing on the computer, via website, and ask that question. who knows it may already be a pre-exsisting Q&A section question.
well. . . . I often see Knight trying to kill Bishop but there is always something covering the bishop. . . . . (EX: Pwan,queen,knight all the others) The it comes to a decision . . . Should I take the bishop by sacrificing the knight???
I like knight alot because it can really do some exchanging by mating your opponent. . . . . .
So should I do it in future like this. . . ??? 0.o
Oh yeah. . . . I used to beat the computer . . at easy level with my crappy stratergy . . . . But now it won't work. . . . It seems like the computer recorded my stratergy. . . . Is that ture 0.o

Thanks for helping.!