Top 3 tips to reach 2000 ELO!

Sort:
Avatar of Honchkrowabcd

Hi guys I just hit 2000 ELO for the first time after a week of playing this "Chess.com" thing! I wanted to share the top 10 tips I used to get to 2000 ELO so you guys can also get there because some people are not 2000 ELO!

Tip #1: Double check your moves. Make sure your move doesn't accidentally leave one of your pieces undefended, and see if your opponent has a very strong response to your move before actually playing it! If your opponent has a very strong response to your move, maybe consider another move.

Tip #2: Put your pieces on good squares. Good squares = the piece controls a lot of squares, makes a lot of threats, prevents your opponents from moving there, and works together with other pieces. If you place all your pieces on good squares, they will be worth more, and work better together so the game will be much easier for you!

Tip #3: Learn En Passant! If you learn the En Passant rule (Google en passant) you will have an advantage over your opponent who likely does not know the En Passant or will not be as familiar with it and you can play it to surprise them.

Avatar of Im_chess_noob

Cool, now I'm motivated to grind to 2000

Avatar of Honchkrowabcd
Im_chess_noob wrote:

Cool, now I'm motivated to grind to 2000

No problem

Avatar of Honchkrowabcd

Use my tips for ez 2000

Avatar of spinge32

Hello bigshortsoup, have you heard of a banned individual who goes my the name of honchkrowabcd?

Avatar of ChessMasteryOfficial

thumbup

Avatar of Dan-likes-clocks-2

I'm on my way to 2000 rapid

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider

thanks!

Avatar of Chesswizardof2012
Warning: this is not to demotivate anyone.

Sadly as a former 2200 I can tell you There is a a lot more to learn than en passant, double checking moves and putting your pieces on good squares. You also have to learn opening endgames and middle game plans.
Avatar of Im_chess_noob

Trust me, En Passant is the most significant knowledge

Avatar of Honchkrowabcd
Chesswizardof2012 wrote:
Warning: this is not to demotivate anyone.
Sadly as a former 2200 I can tell you There is a a lot more to learn than en passant, double checking moves and putting your pieces on good squares. You also have to learn opening endgames and middle game plans.

Not if you place your pieces on really good squares

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
bigshortsoup68 wrote:
Chesswizardof2012 wrote:
Warning: this is not to demotivate anyone.
Sadly as a former 2200 I can tell you There is a a lot more to learn than en passant, double checking moves and putting your pieces on good squares. You also have to learn opening endgames and middle game plans.

Not if you place your pieces on really good squares

Ah yes I deffinently didn't do that to get to 2000 who needs good squares just make your opponent blunder instead

Avatar of Mid-KnightRider
bigshortsoup68 wrote:
Chesswizardof2012 wrote:
Warning: this is not to demotivate anyone.
Sadly as a former 2200 I can tell you There is a a lot more to learn than en passant, double checking moves and putting your pieces on good squares. You also have to learn opening endgames and middle game plans.

Not if you place your pieces on really good squares

If your pieces are all at the right place at the right time all the time, you will get much higher that 2000. Sadly you aren't stockfish.

Avatar of SirCarana

Ahhh, that’s why I’m still stuck in the 1800s/1900s. I was missing En passant! That explains it.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
SirCarana wrote:

Ahhh, that’s why I’m still stuck in the 1800s/1900s. I was missing En passant! That explains it.

Nono BLUNDER CHECKING+(which is a skill that I deffinently use at 2000 elo 😉) instead of looking at what my opponent can do I go "is this a bad square for my piece" looking for bad squares is deffinently the right skill even thouhh if you don't see the bad move how do you know it's bad ? It's a big plot hole

Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry

No offence, but these really don’t sound like the normal level of actual chess insight that most 2000s have. It is roughly what I’d expect someone who has played chess for a week to say.

Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry

Why on earth did your opponent resign in this game? You can’t take the bishop because of the triple fork…

and why did you resign in this position?? You’ve got some strange games haha

Avatar of kleong12

this guy has some good tips

Avatar of Honchkrowabcd
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:

Why on earth did your opponent resign in this game? You can’t take the bishop because of the triple fork…

and why did you resign in this position?? You’ve got some strange games haha

Game 1, he prob missed that triple fork, game 2 my wifi went out

Avatar of badger_song

Congrats, soup68.