Tournament Gamesmanship

Sort:
TadDude

The GM draw is a fairly well known and "accepted" occurrence when players do not want to risk a loss and their chances of placing in the money.

Perhaps lesser known is the misguided and ridiculous idea to lose the first game of a Swiss style tournament. This gets you easier opponents in the middle rounds. But you are already a point behind.

In no way am I casting aspersions and I purposely did not comment here http://www.chess.com/news/capelle-la-grande-open-2011-1664.  I do not believe Krishnan Sasikiran would purposely throw away a White win and rating points for a draw. 

This is a big Swiss so there are loads of lower rated players. After a draw in the first round Sasikiran (2690) is Black against a 2382 rated player.

http://cappelle-chess.fr/fr2/userpages/Cappelle201102Alpha.htm

In a Swiss would you take a draw, or even a loss, in game one for easier subsequent games?

TadDude

True in a normal Swiss.

With an Accelerated Swiss such as at Cappelle, a lower rated player does not run into the big dogs early. The big dogs were given a starting pairing score of two. Those in the middle started with one.

After the draw Saskiran's pairing score went from 2 to 2.5 so only the better players, those also starting at two pairing points, could be paired with Saskiran in the second round.

If a lower rated player threw game one, he would be paired against a little dog not Saskiran. The main point remains though, you are down a point.

TadDude

The Cappelle-la-Grande tournament is not going well for SASIKIRAN Krishnan (2690). He is 2.5/4 now and is scheduled to play ASEFI Zaheeruddeen (2078) who has a score of 3/4.

http://cappelle-chess.fr/fr2/default.php?page=3936

This is a mismatch of 612 ratings points. Not as bad as the 917 point mismatch here.  http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/mismatch-you-have-not-seen-anything-yet

I suppose his lower rated opponent may actually be happy to get a chance to play an almost 2700 GM (who may now be demoralized since he was hoping to break 2700). SASIKIRAN could start a comeback against a string of lower rated players in the latter half of the tournament.

TheOldReb

Its always bad to be ranked #1 in a big swiss Open . Unless the #1 guy is a lot higher rated than the #2 and # 3 he is marked......  Take note of how often the # 1 ranked guy does NOT win such events....... 

TadDude

Reb it looks like you could have been "lucky" enough to play Sasikiran if you had made the trip to France. From the archives, you do not participate.

Kevin Spraggett is currently 3/4. He moved to Portugal, I assume so he could play in the numerous European tournaments.

If you care to share, is it not enough fun/reward to make that trip yourself?

TadDude

This is how dpruess earned a GM norm at Cappelle in 2007. It is not all glitz and glamour.

"... the bathroom was approximately the same size as my refrigerator, and the rest of the room wasn’t much bigger. For two people it would have been a squeeze, never mind three.".

Oh! You anticipated some chess in the story ...

Pruess Wins Norm in France: Part I and Pruess Wins Norm in France: Part II 

TadDude

Either through a flaw in the pairings software or luck, twice there was an odd number of players ahead of him, Sasikiran was paired with the lowest rated player in the group above. This appears to be more beneficial than being paired with someone random in his own group. He has won all these games.

Round 5: [2,5] SASIKIRAN Krishnan 2690 1-0 ASEFI Zaheeruddeen 2078 [3]

Round 8: [5] SASIKIRAN Krishnan 2690 1-0 SHNEIDER Aleksandr 2518 [5,5]

The last, not yet played, game follows the same pattern. Sasikiran will play the lowest rated player in the three-player group with 6.5 points.

Round 9

[6,5] GAJEWSKI Grzegorz 2569 vs JANKOVIC Alojzije 2564 [6,5]

[6,5] IPATOV Alexander 2512 vs SASIKIRAN Krishnan 2690 [6]

If the two leading GMs agree to a draw in the final round, they will have to root for IM Ipatov to hold Sasikiran to at least a draw.

(Since ozzie_c_cobblepot has corrected the usage of Half Swiss Gambit let's retract my "The Half Swiss Gambit may not be so bad." hook.)

ozzie_c_cobblepot

Taking a half-point bye in the first round is called the "swiss gambit", far as I know.

TadDude

For closure on this topic, SASIKIRAN was held to a draw and ended up tied for 5th-31st. Listed as 13th with a performance rating of 2617.

http://cappelle-chess.fr/fr2/default.php?page=3943