True or False Chess is a Draw with Best Play from Both Sides

mpaetz you are being disingenous.

1. I answered your statement why it was incorrect to say that "everybody knew the earth was flat." and you just ignore my answer. And you are very obviously wrong on this one .The reason you are wrong has nothing to do with me.

2. Because many people make incorrect assumptions Does Not Mean any single assumption is incorrect.  If you use logic you should know this. Does the fact that most people thought that the sun revolves around the earth  prove  that the sun does  revolve around the earth?  You are using a logical fallacy. The truth is the truth no matter what most people think. 

3 Some of the draws I mentioned Are posted in this forum --because you did not find them does not mean they are not there. [you probably did not go back far enough]

4. The fact that you seem unaware of much of the evidence given does not mean it is not in the forum.  Much of the evidence given is repeated several times. If you find a piece of evidence given by me as not convincing to you--you are free to post about it and why it is not convincing to you.  [but please do not misquote me] Also I have said many times that just one piece of evidence does not prove anything re is chess a draw? 

5. You misquote me ,many times to try  and make your points. This is disingenuous.  Just to ,give one example I often  said the fact that very strong players know chess is a draw does not "prove" chess is a draw. It is not proof--it is evidence. [and there is a heck lot a lot of evidence beyond that.] Pleaser stop misquoting me.

note [please corrected post #9417 as I made an error in number 5. Sorry for my mistake.]

fonz...ur glitching. like really bad. ur saying that u base alla ur evidence outta CC. thats all fine & good. gotta respect that. BUT (and im talking some serious back) AZ would absolutely destroy the very best open book players (assuming theyre not resourcing AZ too) of yesteryear, today, and tomorrow.

so. whats that do to ur claim ?...it wrecks it...w/ effect. ur brains glitching fonz. sorry (well kinda).

4ex: if u play 1...a6 against AZ's 1. e4, and idc if ur stockfish ?...u WILL be struggling for ='ity the REST of the game. and good luck in getting it !

so. whats this say. ALL the CC games of the past are useless, in example, that chess izza draw. ur argument is at the extreme ends of theory and isnt doing a very good job in holding up in e/d practice.

so. do us all a favor and take back u using CC azza gauge that chess izza draw. do it NOW.

i repeat...DO IT NOW !! (ill 4giv u in da morning)

and who might THAT be ?...the rock ?

It doesn't take that much. Only good will.

False.  Close your eyes.  Imagine the greatest game you've ever played.   You didn't effing draw.  You can control you and only you not your opponent.  A full third of the greatest games in which I've ever played, I outright lost.   Draw mentality is modern, urban, industrial, city-style sickness.  You do know people are involved in a chess game, right?

Pulpy !!...where in the he!! have u been luv ?!

????????

I was about to ask the same.

The appropriate way to find the answer to your question would be Computer Championship on the left tab under  . . . Where it would seem on an open end parameter between two models ie Leela/Stockfish rated above 3400 and pursing a check point conclusion DRAW has 100% occurrence, however many of the matches have a draw point other than Check, such as 'play' e5 Malta or such forth. In which case the variance is greater based on neural tipp and bobb. Further there is a Club called 'CCCC Club' where that question can be answered if not on the chat channel of Computer Championship.

s/b say s/t !

knock knock...

I can't imagine it differently.

uh mind not spamming?

jeez !...just tryn2stimulate.

...and if u hold it against me ?...i'll cyberpull ur favorite molar.

i wuz just tryn2bump this dormant thread.

or...its not how good u are its how good u look doing it

...except doing the wild thing

9436

9437