Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
He didn't. He used the adjective 'female' which is perfectly sound. What's the alternative; v*ginary?
But his preposition does seem heavily based on assumption and prejudice rather than science.
women spend more time nurturing men spend more time in a ruthless competitive setting i.e capitalism the world is corrupt is what im saying
Punctuation!.....is what I'm saying.
Then may I remind you that three or four-dot ellipses are the only correct forms of the ellipsis in English. Just a tip from a writer 
I mean, if you are going to correct someone, do it correctly.
"Female" is the more accurate word for this context.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Unsure how you move to the subject of logic and emotion, but I do have an urge to give you a wedgie.
Here's the real question. Does it matter? Like really, does anyone actually care what anatomy the person on the other side of the screen has? I promise you, I have never thought, "If I go there, takes, takes, takes, then I should be winning, hmm I wonder what my opponents packing down there, ok let's take"
Here's the real question. Does it matter? Like really, does anyone actually care what anatomy the person on the other side of the screen has? I promise you, I have never thought, "If I go there, takes, takes, takes, then I should be winning, hmm I wonder what my opponents packing down there, ok let's take"
Some older people care very much, yes.
One guy was telling me he was annoyed that chessbase included so many garbage games, because there were low rated players, blitz games, and female players...
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Assertion without evidence.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Assertion without evidence.
5 posts (through the night no less) without even a response suggests that you are very invested in the topic. I would suggest emotionally invested.
Your tone has suddenly changed from informally talking about fishing to a childish attempt at speaking like a lawyer - an affectation. Trying to appear logical.
And that's why you reach in your previous comment about emotion and logic.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Assertion without evidence.
5 posts (through the night no less) without even a response suggests that you are very invested in the topic. I would suggest emotionally invested.
Your tone has suddenly changed from informally talking about fishing to a childish attempt at speaking like a lawyer - an affectation. Trying to appear logical.
And that's why you reach in your previous comment about emotion and logic.
You cited SEVEN POSTS as:
"I'm criticizing your sycophancy."
This is an assertion without evidence.
Please state your evidence.
As for change of tone, you're kinda boring. Def not as funny as OP.
Chess is a game of mental warfare waged on the 64 black and white squares. It is a contest to prove your strategical and tactical superiority over the opponent. It is governed by the rules of ruthless logic and sheer complexity.
Males naturally gravitate towards activities involving complex logic and the added attraction of chess is that it can fuel the competitive drive and provide a positive way to channel aggression.
Whereas many women might ask "why do men waste their time on a silly board game?", most men tend to avoid the question entirely and instead are instinctively focused on challenging and crushing the person sitting on the other side of table in a grueling battle of determination and wits.
quite agree ig, but it kinda depends on the individual person
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Assertion without evidence.
5 posts (through the night no less) without even a response suggests that you are very invested in the topic. I would suggest emotionally invested.
Your tone has suddenly changed from informally talking about fishing to a childish attempt at speaking like a lawyer - an affectation. Trying to appear logical.
And that's why you reach in your previous comment about emotion and logic.
You cited SEVEN POSTS as:
"I'm criticizing your sycophancy."
This is an assertion without evidence.
Please state your evidence.
As for change of tone, you're kinda boring. Def not as funny as OP.
And I said that you were emotionally driven, affected, etc.
As for logic, you'd have to actually contribute something to the discussion first.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Assertion without evidence.
5 posts (through the night no less) without even a response suggests that you are very invested in the topic. I would suggest emotionally invested.
Your tone has suddenly changed from informally talking about fishing to a childish attempt at speaking like a lawyer - an affectation. Trying to appear logical.
And that's why you reach in your previous comment about emotion and logic.
You cited SEVEN POSTS as:
"I'm criticizing your sycophancy."
This is an assertion without evidence.
Please state your evidence.
As for change of tone, you're kinda boring. Def not as funny as OP.
And I said that you were emotionally driven, affected, etc.
As for logic, you'd have to actually contribute something to the discussion first.
You wrote:
"7 brown-nosing posts from this one."
This is factually untrue.
Boring troll is boring.
Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months laterthat I found out.
Unpossible! According to OP all females (checks notes) are evolutionarily given to nurturing mens or some waffle.
But seriously , thanks for sharing your experience.
7 brown-nosing posts from this one.
Seven? Where in this thread have I made seven posts "brown nosing " anyone?
Where's the ruthless logic? Don't be so emotional.
I'm criticizing your sycophancy.
Assertion without evidence.
5 posts (through the night no less) without even a response suggests that you are very invested in the topic. I would suggest emotionally invested.
Your tone has suddenly changed from informally talking about fishing to a childish attempt at speaking like a lawyer - an affectation. Trying to appear logical.
And that's why you reach in your previous comment about emotion and logic.
You cited SEVEN POSTS as:
"I'm criticizing your sycophancy."
This is an assertion without evidence.
Please state your evidence.
As for change of tone, you're kinda boring. Def not as funny as OP.
And I said that you were emotionally driven, affected, etc.
As for logic, you'd have to actually contribute something to the discussion first.
You wrote:
"7 brown-nosing posts from this one."
This is factually untrue.
Boring troll is boring.
Thought that it was emotional and illogical?
Now troll yet this one is yet to contribute to the discussion anything but some arse-kissing and a line about a barbeque.
Full of projection.
Stuzzi was just a bit bored.
Stuzzi was just a bit bored.
Thanks pulpy. Was trying to recollect his original username but couldn't
@stuzzicadenti
But I don't think that was the original handle name.
Pretty sure that the person that posted this topic doesn’t have a partner is not in a relationship and knows next to nothing about the opposite sex. There are plenty of Men reading this that probably agree with the comment but know better than to express these opinions in an open forum
I think OP is 12. 13 max. Isn't there an age limit on this site?
Yes, sounds like an immature and ignorant 12 year old. If they are older, then it’s even worse.
According to what I remember, Scishow had debunked the myth that there is a difference between male and female brain and according to biologist standpoint they are the same and can't be differentiated from one another if you compare both of them side by side from each other. But, there are still many thing's we don't know from human brains and scientists are still fascinated at each breakthrough's they discovered and are easily corrected from their assumptions regarding this thing. So, until all of thing's are cleared, we still have to sit back and stay tuned on what other mind boggling discoveries our expert's on their leading fields will unravel. For now, let us give all people equal right whoever they are so that the community will grow healthy by having large amount of diversity to interact from one another ideas and conservation of cultures with proper transcendence of knowledge through time.