Trying to explain the lack of female interest in chess

See this was racist lol not my post lmao

Personally, I don't think of chess as a challenging problem-solving activity that sharpens one's analytical or mental abilities. least, not any longer. 

It's mainly because of the pattern recognition. 

To me, it’s just a specific category of skill. If I keep training for chess, I will only improve at chess. I think our mind is just a pattern recognition machine. If we train ourselves to recognize the patterns of chess, we will only improve in chess and not in other skills. If you invest the same amount of time in other skills, you will specifically improve in those skills.

Chess is also not an ego-crushing game for me like it used to be. At this point, it has become a habit of mine. If I don't play chess, I don’t feel good. It has nothing to do with winning or losing. It's just a useless habit that contributes no quality to my life.

Let me just offer a quick thought as a female -- when I first started playing chess I had no idea that it was male-dominated; I thought chess.com was 50% female. It wasn't until months later that I found out.

If I had known how male-dominated chess was from the outset, I think it would have put me off, just as a subconscious thing -- it just makes me feel, instinctively, like I will be less welcome.

An environment can be unwelcoming without people who aren't affected being aware of it.

Shouldn't pander to it lol

OP is an obvious troll

Prove it, punk

Because you can't become a millionaire easily playing chess, once it becomes profitable then women will show up, just like Marvel and DC movies nowadays

According to what I remember, Scishow had debunked the myth that there is a difference between male and female brain and according to biologist standpoint they are the same and can't be differentiated from one another if you compare both of them side by side from each other. But, there are still many thing's we don't know from human brains and scientists are still fascinated at each breakthrough's they discovered and are easily corrected from their assumptions regarding this thing. So, until all of thing's are cleared, we still have to sit back and stay tuned on what other mind boggling discoveries our expert's on their leading fields will unravel. For now, let us give all people equal right whoever they are so that the community will grow healthy by having large amount of diversity to interact from one another ideas and conservation of cultures with proper transcendence of knowledge through time.

7 brown-nosing posts from this one.

He didn't. He used the adjective 'female' which is perfectly sound. What's the alternative; v*ginary?

But his preposition does seem heavily based on assumption and prejudice rather than science.

Then may I remind you that three or four-dot ellipses are the only correct forms of the ellipsis in English. Just a tip from a writer
I mean, if you are going to correct someone, do it correctly.

I was going to say this but i didnt think it was important enough lol

There are plenty of articles describing the deifferences between our brains "on average" its stupid to think ill beat judit polgar yet shes a woman, it basically worthless statistics for that reason 

"Female" is the more accurate word for this context.