none of the above
Value of the Queen
Sort:
I say Number 1, just because that is closest to what Chess.com states.
...so it's the least inaccurate. 
...and the most accurate. 
Nope, the least inaccurate.
No, the most accurate.
aw shuddup Calba
no wonder u guys have that many points
no you Andy
Shahul2009 wrote:
no wonder u guys have that many points
LOL
Oh, that's it! Im gonna go all OTB on you!
i think the more interesting question would be Queen vs Bishop pair + Knight
9 vs 3+3+3 but sometimes bishop pair is really more like 7... soooo hmmm
two rooks are slightly better than one queen in the majority of cases ^.^
b3nnyhaha wrote:
i think the more interesting question would be Queen vs Bishop pair + Knight
9 vs 3+3+3 but sometimes bishop pair is really more like 7... soooo hmmm
would you exchange a queen for these three?
hmmmm, dont think I would.... (points immaterial)
guess I dont have the confidence.
Nov 17, 2011
0
#18
A lot depends on your level of chess, so for example if you do not know how to play your rooks to there highest level then the queen will easily dominate, therefore a stronger player will beat two rooks evey time against a weaker player, but then same can be said for a stronger player with two rooks against a queen, every thing else being equal. I like to say a queen is worth 10 pts and rook 5pts to keep the math simple! lolo
Which do you think is more accurate ?
1. Queen = Rook + Bishop
2. Queen = Rook + Bishop + Bishop
3. Queen = Rook + Knight + Bishop