theGooseGirl04 wrote:
Anyone think this was a teeny bit rude?
Which part? That the loser did not resign earlier while the winner prolonged the win?
Was This Really Necessary??
Sort:
Should of been a normal person and just mated simply with the first queen
Mar 7, 2024
0
#4
@Lilyana, exactly!! But they insist on making three queens instead.
nice checkmate
how four queen,
ive got 5 queens before and if you dont like it resign.I'm not one of those people who thinks that you should resign if your losing but its fun to try and pull of promotion stunts and i normally just let them do i.
chekagain wrote:
ive got 5 queens before and if you dont like it resign.I'm not one of those people who thinks that you should resign if your losing but its fun to try and pull of promotion stunts and i normally just let them do i.
It's them being disrespectful
White tried his best to throw away the win by stalemating black, but failed.
You know, in matches between good chess players, it's considered rude to continue playing in a completely lost position.
ripley12345 wrote:
You know, in matches between good chess players, it's considered rude to continue playing in a completely lost position.
No. That's quite dumb. And not true. Pro players know to never resign cuz you never know what can happen. It is considered rude to make more than one queen if you know how to play chess correctly and can easily mate with just one
Lilyana wrote:
ripley12345 wrote:
You know, in matches between good chess players, it's considered rude to continue playing in a completely lost position.
No. That's quite dumb. And not true. Pro players know to never resign cuz you never know what can happen. It is considered rude to make more than one queen if you know how to play chess correctly and can easily mate with just one
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/why-do-grandmasters-resign
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/do-most-gm-games-end-in-resignation?sort=relevance
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/how-often-do-master-level-games-end-in-checkmate
Take it from IM @Vlad_Akselrod
"Most GM games end in a draw. Getting mated is considered to be extremely shameful, no one plays till checkmate. At one point it was even fashionable to resign at such (lost) positions where amateurs stared and asked what happened."
and this
"Well, for them it's just a matter of showing their skills. That is, if one GM catches another thinking he's ok while he's totally lost, that's considered a disgrace. For this very reason GMs often play in the "I also see that you're winning" game, thus underscoring how good they are.
Naturally, the weaker the player is, the more rarely he resigns. A complete beginner may even miss mate in one. A noob will play a knight down. A GM may easily resign being down a pawn or two for no compensation."
I don't think I've ever seen and gm get mated
yeah, don't give your opponent a passed pawn for free
ripley12345 wrote:
Take it from IM @Vlad_Akselrod
"Most GM games end in a draw. Getting mated is considered to be extremely shameful, no one plays till checkmate. At one point it was even fashionable to resign at such (lost) positions where amateurs stared and asked what happened."
and this
"Well, for them it's just a matter of showing their skills. That is, if one GM catches another thinking he's ok while he's totally lost, that's considered a disgrace. For this very reason GMs often play in the "I also see that you're winning" game, thus underscoring how good they are.
Naturally, the weaker the player is, the more rarely he resigns. A complete beginner may even miss mate in one. A noob will play a knight down. A GM may easily resign being down a pawn or two for no compensation."
clearly u have nothing betetr to with ur life then waste ur time on the internet finding useless information nobody cares about just to proove a point about a topic nobody should care about... have a good day
Anyone think this was a teeny bit rude?