Game accuracy doesn't mean much. If you win an eight-move game, your accuracy is probably 95%. But if you have a 95% accuracy in an eighty-move game, then that means you played very well. And sometimes capturing a hanging queen is considered a great move. Like blueemu said, "A walk-over is not a "good" game.".
What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?
Sort:
If I disregard short and lobsided games, I see a consistency in the reported accuracies. I find that my game accuracy below 70% are sloppy performances, 70-75% mediocre, 75-80% average, 80-85% good, 85-90% very good, and just above 90% are the best games that I can offer. I imagine that intermediate and strong players make more accurate moves all the time.
You really deserve a medal for brilliance!
You still don't get it, don't you?
It depends on size of the target. It's easier to achieve greater accuracy on a larger target.
accuracy 101
jk
any way what does the face instead of a number as accuracy mean
stancco wrote:
You really deserve a medal for brilliance!
You still don't get it, don't you?
It depends on size of the target. It's easier to achieve greater accuracy on a larger target.
I think we all understand that stancco. It is more difficult to get a high accuracy against stronger opponents. If we interpret accuracy in this context, it is quite useful.
Ziryab wrote:
h4java wrote:
stancco wrote:
You really deserve a medal for brilliance!
You still don't get it, don't you?
It depends on size of the target. It's easier to achieve greater accuracy on a larger target.
I think we all understand that stancco. It is more difficult to get a high accuracy against stronger opponents. If we interpret accuracy in this context, it is quite useful.
What do you say about 1200s who routinely score 60% against players who are 800-1200, but then get an accuracy in the mid-80s when the opponent is 1700?
I have no idea. I am a 1200s player, and chess.com pairs me with players of similar rating. I never had an opponent with a 1700 rating, and I have stopped getting 800 rated players after I improved my game. Maybe some members here let their guard down when they have lower rated opponents.
When I let chess.com score my own games, I can guess my own rating beforehand based on the perceived effort and control. That's all I wanted to say.
BUCKLEYNYC wrote:
w24ha shut up
keep living in your parents house friend.
Apr 13, 2023
0
#252
Milo543 wrote:
any way what does the face instead of a number as accuracy mean
It means 0 accuracy.
Apr 24, 2023
0
#254
Okay this forum has people who are bad characters, does anyone want to read page 13?
May 4, 2023
0
#255
ShrekChess69420 wrote:
I played a game with 99.9% accuracy.
Yes. Me too. And no way do bodybuilders take steroids.
I'm just happy with a win lol.
95
I just got 95.2 and I’m a 450 elo is that any good or should I be getting 97 ish
Once on Chess Universe app I achievef 92% accuracy according to their engine.
That is not related to discussion and politically offensive
What do i mean ? is quite clear isn't ? people who's tax payer in US and have a flag of Ukraine on the profile should stay away from chess for obvious reasons , and choose carefully your words towards me pal