What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?
Sort:
The lower accuracy I can get away it while winning the better
Oct 21, 2023
0
#302
i got my first diamond move with 363 elo https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/81870872116?tab=review&move=46
ShrekChess69420 wrote:
I played a game with 99.9% accuracy.
what, did he resign after e4
80%
Nov 12, 2023
0
#306
TomekPrzemek16 wrote:
I'm a person not a number, besides I was 733 the day before.
Besides if you are over 2000 just after joining this place you must be a f-ing ch^%ter!
Why'd you block me, huh? I was making more valid points in your obnoxious thread than you were.
^Agreed, why?
Nov 12, 2023
0
#308
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:
^Agreed, why?
Suppose we night know when he comes back online.
I think any percent is a win as long as you get the win! #beKind #IonlyWin
Nov 13, 2023
0
#313
Is this game good for a 500 player? That's me. https://www.chess.com/emboard?id=11225549 sorry I don't know how to delete comments.
TomekPrzemek16 wrote:
Someone's really into statistics here
Unfortunately life has been toxic to me since I remember, why should I be different to others?
I suck not only at chess but pretty much at everything aside from being toxic
Because you can start being better today. Over half of life, including ultimate success, is not about being "good" at "things." It's about how you treat people. It's up to you.
Dang this is getting deep
How do simple chess questions end up becoming vicious moral arguments??
It's like that refusing to resign thread..who cares? It's all for fun and games, lighten up people.
110%
Nov 16, 2023
0
#319
TomekPrzemek16 wrote:
Abysall Sludge, you're completely worthless, too.
Says the person who can’t spell “Abyssal” correctly. Just because life is toxic to you doesn’t mean you have to take it out on everyone else.