What happened to the puzzle ratings??

Sort:
Avatar of Martin_Stahl
Magician wrote:.

Makes sense, but I have been trying the new puzzles, and seems they are quite easy for my new rating level. I don't think I will have a problem getting close to 3k in the new system, making the deduction feel a bit arbitrary and inaccurate

My guess is that most people won't be able to get anywhere near their old ratings, though I could be wrong

Avatar of RetributionXII
I think we should have at least been able to vote on something like this
Avatar of Martin_Stahl
RetributionXII wrote:
I think we should have at least been able to vote on something like this

There's no way the site could get any kind of consensus on proposed changes.

Avatar of MrChatty
RetributionXII wrote:
if this buffoonery continues any longer.

You mean "one more change like this and I am out"?

Avatar of Magician
Martin_Stahl wrote:

My guess is that most people won't be able to get anywhere near their old ratings, though I could be wrong

yeah I wont either since my old rating was 4.5k. But 2.3k as my new rating doesn't seem accurate when I'm doing the puzzles of that level

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
Magician wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:

My guess is that most people won't be able to get anywhere near their old ratings, though I could be wrong

yeah I wont either since my old rating was 4.5k. But 2.3k as my new rating doesn't seem accurate when I'm doing the puzzles of that level

That's aligned well with your rapid rating.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl

That said, it looks like your puzzle Difficulty is in Standard. If you change to Hard or Extra Hard you might see a difference.

Avatar of Magician
Martin_Stahl wrote:

That's aligned well with your rapid rating.

It is, but I feel like if they want puzzle ratings to have decent correlation with rapid/blitz ratings they should make the new system even more harsh. I think most people will still easily get a much higher puzzle rating compared to their normal ratings

Avatar of Martin_Stahl

There's a balance that needs to exist. If it's too hard, very few people will want to do them.

That's one of the reasons for the difficulty setting. Staff are even looking into a harder setting for those that like it. However, it's looking like the rating system should prevent the massive rating differences from the past

Avatar of Sargon_Three
Bohdivista wrote:

Restore my rating, or I'm done with chess.com.

The ratings crashed for everyone, so relax, bro.

Avatar of whiteknight1968

Puzzles are a training tool. Your "rating" doesn't mean anything.

Lets give it a couple of months before we pass judgment on the changes.

Seems that the site can make sweeping changes - so how about a classical category? I've been playing on the other place for months because chess.com does not have this.

Avatar of MrChatty
whiteknight1968 wrote:

how about a classical category?

The legends say it is planned, perhaps even this year

Avatar of ksakamoto

Okay. I read the article and it makes sense. Was there a notification that I missed?

Avatar of whiteknight1968

I sure hope so because this is the single reason that I prefer the other site

Avatar of MrChatty
ksakamoto wrote:

Was there a notification that I missed?

Nope

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
whiteknight1968 wrote:

...

Seems that the site can make sweeping changes - so how about a classical category? I've been playing on the other place for months because chess.com does not have this.

There's a plan for a Classical and Hyper-bullet category.

Avatar of DreamscapeHorizons

Good.

Avatar of Thee_Ghostess_Lola

...following with bated sighs.