my elo amount sucks
What is a good (bullet) Elo?
Sort:
Um.
FYI Chess.com rating is *NOT* ELO.
ELO is from Fide, and chess.com rating is completely different.
For example every game gives you chess.com rating. Every. Single. One.
Unless you play someone so far below your own rating that you gain zero increment, and then this game wont do anything. Unless of course you draw or lose.
Which is what ELO doesnt need to do. Which is also why GM Hikaru Nakamura held insane chess.com ratings like 3400 in the past. Only for a short amount of time, mind. But still !
Good luck trying to ever get Fide ELO 3400 ...
Elo is elo ether or not you like it tho fida elo is harder to get than chess.com elo
May 8, 2024
0
#45
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Elo is elo ether or not you like it tho fida elo is harder to get than chess.com elo
Indeed
May 8, 2024
0
#46
MariasWhiteKnight wrote:
Um.
FYI Chess.com rating is *NOT* ELO.
ELO is from Fide, and chess.com rating is completely different.
For example every game gives you chess.com rating. Every. Single. One.
Unless you play someone so far below your own rating that you gain zero increment, and then this game wont do anything. Unless of course you draw or lose.
Which is what ELO doesnt need to do. Which is also why GM Hikaru Nakamura held insane chess.com ratings like 3400 in the past. Only for a short amount of time, mind. But still !
Good luck trying to ever get Fide ELO 3400 ...
Elo is not full caps, only the E is. It's a name
BlackholeExpert2021 wrote:
That's not bad, if anything look at my Rapid and bullet compared to my blitz lol.
Relatable
jackityjackjack wrote:
I divide beginners into these categories: Under 500 are usually horrible players who make moves as fast as possible and can be checkmated in about 10 moves usually. 500-700 is usually players who think about their moves too much and timeout. 700-1000 are decent players who can move fast and think enough for it to be called playing chess. After that, 1000-1500 is intermediate, 1500-2200 is quite good, and Anything above 2200 is just amazing.
above 2200 is just grandmaster level already or international master or a FIDE master and etc.
2500
I reached 2200 and I can confirm that we all suck
I hang pieces and get flagged so just play like the cow opening or hippo or even bongloud and you can win because they will give you free pieces yfm
thechessgrinder wrote:
2500
I reached 2200 and I can confirm that we all suck
I hang pieces and get flagged so just play like the cow opening or hippo or even bongloud and you can win because they will give you free pieces yfm
Unless you assume everyone is cheating us 2200s know how good and bad we are we just don't know necessarily how to fix our mistakes some of the time and get stuck !
300
#12 Bullet is hard and so it might not be the way you ranked them.
Jun 21, 2024
0
#57
Cirrin wrote:
Six_Pack_Of_Flabs wrote:
I'd say U1200 would be a beginner range. Between 1200-1300 is the low end of mid-level, 1300-1600 is a direct middle, and 1600-2000 is the high end of the range. 2000-2300 is a lower high, 2300-2700 is a middle high, and everything above 2700 is extremely advanced.
Completely agreed. The people who downvoted you are probably just 800s who don't know the real meaning of "advanced".
Indeed.
Cirrin wrote:
Although, from my perspective
A 2000 rating is a beginner level, a terrible level, many others this level probably think the same
The main reason is because, once you reach this level, you realize you are a beginner in the world of expert and master level players
Nevertheless, I think 1800+ bullet is a good rating overall because IMO, that's when bullet chess starts to become more quality and a more about playing decent chess than the clock (mostly based off of my own experience
Nah 2000s can beat 2600s that is not begginer level
Cirrin wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Cirrin wrote:
Although, from my perspective
A 2000 rating is a beginner level, a terrible level, many others this level probably think the same
The main reason is because, once you reach this level, you realize you are a beginner in the world of expert and master level players
Nevertheless, I think 1800+ bullet is a good rating overall because IMO, that's when bullet chess starts to become more quality and a more about playing decent chess than the clock (mostly based off of my own experience
Nah 2000s can beat 2600s that is not begginer level
i mean it's a beginner level in the 2000+ pool
Yes, sometimes they can beat much higher rated players, but it doesn't mean they are that good
Ironically I trick 2300+ all the time I just suck at spotting the tactic
Good enough to trick them most games not good enough to see sed trick
Depending on the person it is beginner level for me mostly calculation issues but not "skill level issues "
personally im not sure because people often tilt very far in bullet so even if their elo drops to around 800 or something they could have been 1500
Indeed. The most I've ever tilted was ~50 Elo, idk if that'd even be considered a tilt tho...
haha yhe furthest ive ever tilted is 500