What is the best engine to analyze with?

Sort:
krazeechess

Give your thoughts...

sndeww

I've used chess.com engine all my life

Vegeto-Edits
Hello
krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

2007David14pro

alguien quiere jugar de mi nivel tongue.png

krazeechess

speak english please

SpacePodz
He might not know English
SpacePodz
Google translate says his post means


someone wants to play at my level

But google translate isn’t always accurate so idk
sndeww
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

speak english please

sndeww
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

speak english please

Use your brains not computers

under no circumstances should you really be analyzing anything at depth 30, that’s more than half the average chess game

krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

speak english please

Use your brains not computers

under no circumstances should you really be analyzing anything at depth 30, that’s more than half the average chess game

I feel like it takes too long to go through every move and analyze it. Assume a 60 move game, and you spend 2 min analyzing in your head for every move. First 10 moves are opening theory. Then, you would be spending almost 2 hours analyzing. I would rather first analyze with computer and then go over the inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders. Besides, read question in the OP.

sndeww

Right. I do that. But there is literally no point in making the engine think longer for a good move to become inaccurate if you don’t know why.

krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:

Right. I do that. But there is literally no point in making the engine think longer for a good move to become inaccurate if you don’t know why.

Wait does depth 26 mean 26 moves in each line or 26 different lines?

sndeww

I don’t know and I don’t care. I’ve always run the engine at around depth 15-18, and when I was a free member I just used the depth 10 analysis.

krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:

I don’t know and I don’t care. I’ve always run the engine at around depth 15-18, and when I was a free member I just used the depth 10 analysis.

I think depth 15 - 18 is really low cuz it sometimes doesn't spot certain moves which are obviously not mistakes.

sndeww

yeah it doesn't spot certain moves but that's an error that will happen to any engine at any depth.