What is the best engine to analyze with?

Sort:
Avatar of krazeechess

Give your thoughts...

Avatar of keep1teasy

I've used chess.com engine all my life

Avatar of Vegeto-Edits
Hello
Avatar of krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Avatar of 2007David14pro

alguien quiere jugar de mi nivel tongue.png

Avatar of krazeechess

speak english please

Avatar of SpacePodz
He might not know English
Avatar of SpacePodz
Google translate says his post means


someone wants to play at my level

But google translate isn’t always accurate so idk
Avatar of keep1teasy
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

Avatar of krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

speak english please

Avatar of keep1teasy
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

speak english please

Use your brains not computers

under no circumstances should you really be analyzing anything at depth 30, that’s more than half the average chess game

Avatar of krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:
krazeechess hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

I've used chess.com engine all my life

bruh

Go with head not silicon

speak english please

Use your brains not computers

under no circumstances should you really be analyzing anything at depth 30, that’s more than half the average chess game

I feel like it takes too long to go through every move and analyze it. Assume a 60 move game, and you spend 2 min analyzing in your head for every move. First 10 moves are opening theory. Then, you would be spending almost 2 hours analyzing. I would rather first analyze with computer and then go over the inaccuracies/mistakes/blunders. Besides, read question in the OP.

Avatar of keep1teasy

Right. I do that. But there is literally no point in making the engine think longer for a good move to become inaccurate if you don’t know why.

Avatar of krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:

Right. I do that. But there is literally no point in making the engine think longer for a good move to become inaccurate if you don’t know why.

Wait does depth 26 mean 26 moves in each line or 26 different lines?

Avatar of keep1teasy

I don’t know and I don’t care. I’ve always run the engine at around depth 15-18, and when I was a free member I just used the depth 10 analysis.

Avatar of krazeechess
B1ZMARK wrote:

I don’t know and I don’t care. I’ve always run the engine at around depth 15-18, and when I was a free member I just used the depth 10 analysis.

I think depth 15 - 18 is really low cuz it sometimes doesn't spot certain moves which are obviously not mistakes.

Avatar of keep1teasy

yeah it doesn't spot certain moves but that's an error that will happen to any engine at any depth.

Avatar of Optimissed

There's no point analysing to a great depth with a computer. Either you can do it in your head and understand it or it's useless in any case.