His king is neither in- or moving through check. Perfectly legal move.
Castling when only the rook passes through a square being attacked
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
You can't check a rook FFS! Learn the rules!
Well, at least I'm in good company. If that is the case, the arbiter between Korchnoi-Karpov candidates 1974 was also wrong.
I agree, that has always been my understanding - neither the rook nor the king can move through an attacked square in castling.
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
You think chess.com has coded the chess moves wrong? Put it in any chess engines and it will be allowed. Did they code them wrong too. What seems more likely, that everyone is wrong and the noob you are is right? Please...
You're 1400 blitz. Enough said.
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
You can't check a rook FFS! Learn the rules!
I think I'd know the rules better than a 712 rated blitz player.
You are wrong. You can't check a rook, thus a rook can legally move through an attacked square.
See the following brilliant article by Serper:
https://www.chess.com/article/view/do-grandmasters-know-the-rules-of-chess
Take a look at question 4 It's a common mistake, so don't be embarrassed.
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
You can't check a rook FFS! Learn the rules!
I think I'd know the rules better than a 712 rated blitz player.
Said by the 800 rated rapid player ?
Well, dude, When the ROCK is captured, it does nothing to the castling.
I advise you learn the rules again.
Well, dude, When the ROCK is captured, it does nothing to the castling.
I advise you learn the rules again.
what is a ROCK LOLOLOLOL
Well, dude, When the ROCK is captured, it does nothing to the castling.
I advise you learn the rules again.
what is a ROCK LOLOLOLOL
That is true, but only for the kimg piece. The O-O-O is perfectly legal when the rook is attacked, or moves through an attacked square.
No dude you're wrong. Check applies to rook and king. Rook can't go through check when castling.
You think chess.com has coded the chess moves wrong? Put it in any chess engines and it will be allowed. Did they code them wrong too. What seems more likely, that everyone is wrong and the noob you are is right? Please...
You're 1400 blitz. Enough said.
Go on and continue making a complete fool of yourself in public like this. What's next, the earth is flat?
He castle queen side through check...wtf!!!!!