what is your chess.com rating compared to your Lichess rating?

rapid: 1737(LC) and 1737(classical/LC) vs 1240(CC)
blitz: (1570(LC) vs 971(CC)
puzzles: 2187(LC) vs 2733(CC)
daily: 1610*(LC) vs 952(CC)

*=provisional

no bullet by the way
anyway if u want: 669(from 2 games) vs 1258*(1 game)
lichess: https://lichess.org/@/HeylithaV

2000 here rn and 2600 on lichess

Yes, at that level the difference is 300 points but as you look at higher rates players the difference is 200 points, then 100 points and around 2400-2500 lichess ratings and chess com ratings are the same, which means that if you are 400 points higher rated than your opponent on lichess you have a better chance of victory than if you are 400 points higher rated than your opponent on this website.

1400 here, 1900 there

PS I dont play much

For 30/0 I am 1391 here and 1809 there, I'd say that 300 difference is an underestimate

My Lichess rating is absolute diarrhea.

Yeah I agree, but chess.com is only the best website if you get the diamond membership. Otherwise it's a total waste.

I don't play often on chesscom because I don't like multiple premoves and lag for the non US players. My peak rating on lichess bullet is 2400 and here 2380. I think it is about the same. I think I could get higher rating on chesscom if I would play more and get familiar with multiple premoves. Now I get confused at the end whose turn it is to move.

1106 on ches.com and 1306 on lichess

1473 cc 1750 lichess (rapid)

I’m 1320 cc and 2032 lichess rapid

I tanked my lichess bullet last night playing on my phone. Was winning most games, but lost on time.

L.org has higher ratings but a superior system. On l.org I play people who are as good as me, which is very easy to see. However, on chess.com I experience people much better than me, and players much worse. It’s a dice roll. You should be playing people relative to your level. Not people better then you or people much worse. L.org has higher ratings but a superior rating system (also the fact that diamond members get paired with diamond members seems fishy to me. Wouldn’t that somehow mess up the ratings? Like those willing to pay much money for chess playing will tend to be better. It seems to me that even actually playing not the dice roll nonsense of player strength is also a paid option. You’ve got to pay to play essentially.)

finally 2500 on lichess blitz i hit this back like 3 days ago and it was nice

blitz - 1500 lichess vs 900 chess.com.

2100 blitz here 2200 blitz on lichess

2050 rapid here, 2240 rapid there

2010 blitz here, 2090 blitz there

2210 bullet here, 2250 bullet there

None of those are hugely different. I think daily seems to have probably the biggest difference – 1730 here, 2150 there. I haven't played many daily games on Lichess, but in the little I have played, it wasn't too challenging to get above 2100.