"What makes a player truly strong in chess?"

Sort:
Avatar of IshaanJRagesh

Is it tactics, openings, endgames or just overall experience? I see players with low theory knowledge but they still win a lot because they just understand positions better. What do you guys think matters most?

Avatar of White-rabbit1

I think it's experience

Avatar of IshaanJRagesh

I also thinks so. But I need to know everyone's opinions.

Avatar of NotNerdyN3rd

I think it's mainly middlegame knowledge, and then experience.

Avatar of Da-Rook-Sacrificer

Just give me tips so I can become a GM

Avatar of mikewier

Chess strength cannot be reduced to one or two factors. Endgame ability, opening preparation, calculation, and positional judgment all have roles.

i like to watch broadcasts of super grandmaster tournaments. In many games, one player deviates from theory in the opening with a quiet move, such as a6 or h3. The commentators then spend 10 minutes discussing how this move impacts subsequent development and middlegame plans. The players are not simply blitzing out opening moves they have memorized. Rather, they have a deep understanding of how every move interacts with everything that will follow.

Avatar of ians-traning-account

it all depends on how many fish they own

Avatar of mikewier

A psychologist once conducted a study in which chess players of different strengths were presented a game position and then were asked to analyze the position aloud.

Several findings stand out.

1. Stronger players do not look farther ahead than weaker players.

2. The moves first considered by stronger players are simply better than those considered by weaker players.

3. strong players keep returning to the key move. If their initial calculations do not work, they return to the key move and try to make it work in a different way. 

what all this means is that masters have acquired a large number of positional concepts and so recognize quickly the key elements of a position.

How do they acquire this? Experience. Study. Work.

Avatar of observant_machine
I think practise makes a man perfect. When some players are trying to logic or theories other players keep going. I think that makes the difference.
Avatar of observant_machine
It was a better discussion and guys on my comment above I mean trying to find ( you have to be careful while writing 🫣)
Avatar of observant_machine
Nice information @ NM Mike wire
Avatar of dlisbrothers

I think it's experience and practice

Avatar of Da-Rook-Sacrificer
mikewier wrote:

A psychologist once conducted a study in which chess players of different strengths were presented a game position and then were asked to analyze the position aloud.

Several findings stand out.

1. Stronger players do not look farther ahead than weaker players.

2. The moves first considered by stronger players are simply better than those considered by weaker players.

3. strong players keep returning to the key move. If their initial calculations do not work, they return to the key move and try to make it work in a different way.

what all this means is that masters have acquired a large number of positional concepts and so recognize quickly the key elements of a position.

How do they acquire this? Experience. Study. Work.

Where to watch these games live

Avatar of magipi
mikewier wrote:

1. Stronger players do not look farther ahead than weaker players.

This is certainly false. Or at least there should be some huge caveats that are missing from your post.

Beginners calculate exactly 0 moves ahead.

Avatar of Da-Rook-Sacrificer

I see negative 1 move ahead