What other interests do you have apart from Chess?

Sort:
egoole

Why is every thread turning into this............... Yell

Trash_Aesthetic
fischerman_bob wrote:

Trash Aesthetic,

For a 190 IQ you misunderstand a lot. Yes, I am familiar with Hannah (Eichman, the banality of evil). That has NOTHING to do with my post. I am not arguing in favor of Nazism. I am also not arguing for the proposition that the queen of England eats frogs.

Are you saying that logic is an example of the banality of evil???? So if I say "1+1=2" I am being evil?????

only if your logic (your reasoning, your law) is bad.

Trash_Aesthetic

i dont know if 1 + 1 equals 2 when dealing with people..... maybe in mathematics although that is debated too but ok

Trash_Aesthetic

ethics for example goes by an other-logic

fischerman_bob

Agreed! You are a troll!! Saying things you do not believe just to start a fight.

Or do you actually believe that all propositions are true??????

Trash_Aesthetic

iq of 190 doesnt make me smart, in fact it makes me a little stupid..... but thats needed if you want to understand anything

kleelof
Fiveofswords wrote:

nazism refers to a set of beliefs. those beliefs may be true or false. to say nazism is true implies those beliefs that make up nazism are true.

or, if you dont consider nazism to be a set of beliefs like kleelof seems to...but rather a something like method of authorative governing as it also seemed to be outside of its core beliefs, then saying it is true is not valid.

only a statement can be true or false....one guy hears nazism is true and they imagine [the set of core beliefs behind the philosophy of nazism] is true. That statement is valid (but false)

the other guy isnt hearing that implied statement for some reason...they are hearing something like 'chair is true'...which is not valid. because they dont automatically tie nazism with a set of beliefs.

Geeze. Weren't you just talking about going in circles a minute ago? Laughing

Trash_Aesthetic
fischerman_bob wrote:

Agreed! You are a troll!! Saying things you do not believe just to start a fight.

Or do you actually believe that all propositions are true??????

thats what Heraclitus believed right?

Trash_Aesthetic
Trash_Aesthetic wrote:

iq of 190 doesnt make me smart, in fact it makes me a little stupid..... but thats needed if you want to understand anything

as freud said enough resistance for traction

kleelof
fischerman_bob wrote:

Agreed! You are a troll!! Saying things you do not believe just to start a fight.

Or do you actually believe that all propositions are true??????

Oh, were we fighting? Because if so, I should warn you, I have 4" claws and 6" teeth.

Trash_Aesthetic
kleelof wrote:
fischerman_bob wrote:

Agreed! You are a troll!! Saying things you do not believe just to start a fight.

Or do you actually believe that all propositions are true??????

Oh, were we fighting? Because if so, I should warn you, I have 4" claws and 6" teeth.

yes he does i can see it clearly in my imagination.... rawr........

Trash_Aesthetic

see it was funny to think about...... a little more interesting.......

fischerman_bob

Nazism is a set of beliefs. Of course they probably think it is merely a question of fashion. Propositoons (such as 1+1=2) are not true,its just fashionable to believe that. I find that position silly.

Trash_Aesthetic
fischerman_bob wrote:

Nazism is a set of beliefs. Of course they probably think it is merely a question of fashion. Propositoons (such as 1+1=2) are not true,its just fashionable to believe that. I find that position silly.

i just dont know if anything is true or if it is all a fiction......... i dont judge whats right or wrong and save my energies for being nice to other people

fischerman_bob

Well trash, you may think you are winning the debate. However, you have yet to prove that logic is a myth. Since you do not believe in logic or truth (that a proposition is true or false), you cannot make any cogent argument.

fischerman_bob

Intuition is because of the logical structure of the brain. Our brains make calculations that we are unaware of. For example, I do not have to think move this finger,then that one when playing the piano. Its not because of some non-rational supernatural power.

Trash_Aesthetic wrote:

logic is for when we dont have an intuition, as you know from chess

Trash_Aesthetic
fischerman_bob wrote:

Well trash, you may think you are winning the debate. However, you have yet to prove that logic is a myth. Since you do not believe in logic or truth (that a proposition is true or false), you cannot make any cogent argument.

exactly, i am going to step out....... im late im late for a very important date as alice in wonderland once said..........

Ziryab
kleelof wrote:

I'd offer you a beer if drinking were allowed at Chess.com. 

It can be difficult to visit these forums unless one has been drinking.

kleelof
fischerman_bob wrote:

Well trash, you may think you are winning the debate. However, you have yet to prove that logic is a myth. Since you do not believe in logic or truth (that a proposition is true or false), you cannot make any cogent argument.

Man, you're taking this all too seriously.

I think you don't realize that GreedyPawnReader was just messing around with all that fashion stuff. (One of his better troll attempts)

You've let it get you all riled up. I really don't think anyone else here is trying to start some big drawn-out argument with you.

fischerman_bob

Anyway, I have no idea if you are just being a troll or you really believe the silly things you say.

It is true that I am not a unicorn. Propositions are true or false.