What other interests do you have apart from Chess?

Looking at the forums

Just so you know, there is no 'logical' structure of the brain. Logic is a human invention.

Trolls really sound like they believe what they say. OK, I was fooled. They knew what they were saying was nonsense and I fell for it.

Nope! Computers have a logical structure. As do brains. If a computer was not based on logic, it couldnt solve any equation.

kleelof wrote:

fischerman_bob wrote:

Intuition is because of the logical structure of the brain. 

Just so you know, there is no 'logical' structure of the brain. Logic is a human invention.

The brain absolutely has a logical structure. That's what proves Intelligent Design. Logic is the discovery of universal Truth.

You are confused as to what logical structure means. It does not mean that the computer thinks," Existential quantifier therefore an example of a universal quantifier." Logical structure means that the matter is arranged in a pattern that produces logical results. Similarly, a Mozart CD does not sound like Mozart when held in your hand. However, the structure of Mozart's music is encoded into the disk.

A really great book to read about this subject is 'How the Mind Works' by Stephen Pinker. It really gives a lot of insight into how the brain is assembeled and how it works. 

I think you will find that not only is the brain NOT assembled in a logical way, the whole computer/brain analogy is not nearly as accurate as people have believed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Pinker

Logic is a human invention*? So if no humans existed 1+1would not =2?????

If it was intelligent design, don't you think it would have been more intelligent? 

Symantics is not a valid nor respected debate technique.

So you are saying that there is no logical structure to the brain??? It is just a random pattern of matter.

I have read Pinker. He agrees with me. The brain has a logical structure. Heck, even cells have a logical structure.

You are confused. That was not a semantic argument, unless you think that anything with words is a semantic argument.

kleelof wrote:

fischerman_bob wrote:

Logic is a human invention*? So if no humans existed 1+1would not =2?????

Symantics is not a valid nor respected debate technique.

It's a good starting point.

1+1=2 is an example of a logical proposition.

If all logical propositions exist solely because humans created them,it follows that if there were no humans there would be no logical propositions such as 1+1=2.1+1=2 would not be true in a world without humans. Thatis silly!

Zing! Ziryab should be so wounded by this brilliiant riposte that I doubt we'll see any more argument from him.

by the way...

What other interests do you have apart from Chess? lol

I like to play a little guitar.

The guitar isn't little.