What Rating Would Perfect Play Have?
Sort:
Perfect? Go beat alpha zero and stockfish 8 together.
stiggling wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
What does "perfect play" mean?
Don't ask!
It might spawn another 1000 post topic.
We'll have every genius in chess.com tell us about how their definition of perfect play is correct and everyone else is dumb.
You were 5 days late to the 1000 post topic: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/define-best-move
Oct 27, 2018
0
#23
osdeving wrote:
This discussion is good because it shows that the strength of a player when measured in rating points is relative to the field. I once was third in a tournament where I draw against a first place and won the second place, I felt that it was somehow unfair. I remember that I was not bored because I did not win the tournament, but for not having stayed at least second, lol
A good result for you is winning against a master.
A good result for a master is winning against a GM.
A bad result for a master is losing against you.
A bad result for you is losing against a retard.
---
Do you understand?
Stiggling, a good result for someone like you is you got to 2000 in blitz whilst the average rating of the players you beat to get there is 1300. Guess it shows that ratings ( in the short term ) are false especially looking at yours. But you sit on that 2000 for as long as you can.........
Oct 27, 2018
0
#25
bishbash1 wrote:
Stiggling, a good result for someone like you is you got to 2000 in blitz whilst the average rating of the players you beat to get there is 1300. Guess it shows that ratings ( in the short term ) are false especially looking at yours. But you sit on that 2000 for as long as you can.........
Look at my playing history.
I play people rated under 1000 in rated games and gain zero points and this changes my average stats.
You are a coward.
You play higher rated players because you GAIN MORE for a win and you LOSE LESS for a loss.
I stopped at 2000 because I don't give a shit.
You set your seeks to play higher rated players because you're a coward.
And I'm better at chess than you.
Suck on that.
Idiot.
Oct 27, 2018
0
#26
I mean look at that. Your blitz rating is only 2 points above 2000 and you want to tell me I suck.
Fuck off.
It's well known you manipulate your rating by setting seeks to only play higher rated players.
If you play random opponents your rating will go down.
Lol I’m not even suggesting that half of your 34 games against one player throwing games imronilm or was that you playing yourself..........oops has your plan been scuppered lol.... now run along.
Oct 27, 2018
0
#28
Play a 10 game match against me, idiot.
Play me 10 games of 1|0
and 10 games of 3|0
Oct 27, 2018
0
#29
I've talked you to before by the way, with my other accounts.
All above 2000.
As I said, you're a coward. You only play higher rated players because you know that way you'll GAIN MORE POINTS FOR A WIN and you'll LOSE LESS POINTS FOR A LOSS.
And even with your rating manipulation you're only 2 points above 2000.
I'd be above 2200.
Oct 27, 2018
0
#30
Let me tell you why you attempt to bully people like me.
You know you've been manipulating your ratings.
You know it, and you're ashamed.
So you try and tell others they're guilty of it.
Classic projection.
100% of my games played here are drunk. I can have a rating over yours any time, with any account.
Fuck off.
Lol guess you get your accounts closed a lot.
Oct 27, 2018
0
#32
I closed my last account, and you can check that yourself.
You can also look at my games.
I played 100% of them drunk and even had losing positions against low rated players but won in the end because it's blitz.
I stopped at 2000 because it's fun.
I pumped my bullet rating above 2000 because (again) I was drunk and I thought it'd be fun.
