When you get a winning position is it good to offer draw so that your rating don't increase?


Eh I think it’s better to just win
Agreed. One should learn to convert winning positions instead of just sabotaging their own success.

i haven't use it yet.I just want to see what is the opinion of everyone.

Sounds like you need practice converting winning positions into a structural/material advantage (dynamic -> static advantage).
There are lots of online books and courses which can help you do that.

Sounds like you need practice converting winning positions into a structural/material advantage (dynamic -> static advantage).
There are lots of online books and courses which can help you do that.
thanks

That's kinda sandbagging isn't it?
I mean not really, but is that why you think it's good? So you match up with weaker opponents?
Offer a draw only if it is a clear draw. Do not care about rating. Care about better chess. Agreeing on a draw in a better position does not help you in any way.

That's kinda sandbagging isn't it?
I mean not really, but is that why you think it's good? So you match up with weaker opponents?
No,that is not the reason why i think it is good.the reason is that you can get in winning positions more often and you can improve more.

That's kinda sandbagging isn't it?
I mean not really, but is that why you think it's good? So you match up with weaker opponents?
No,that is not the reason why i think it is good.the reason is that you can get in winning positions more often and you can improve more.
No, because you'll never play higher rated opponents. And, in fact, your rating will drop if you do that, all draws and losses will cause your rating to plummet.

One of the key skills to master at low ratings is to win won positions.
The fastest way to improve is playing against slightly stronger opponents so it is never a good idea to hold your grade down.

Ok, thanks for all the opinions! In the end, i have come to the conclusion that this is a bad method and should never be use.

It's an interesting concept. Based on a lack of confidence .... you think you will lose against stronger players and you enjoy beating weaker ones because it helps your tactical ability. It is a known way of practising chess .... to practise tactics against weaker players.
It's actually cheating.
Yeah, that's what I said. That it was kinda like sandbagging.
So you may think this is a weird question but the reason i think it is good is because you can build consistency and improve.Any thoughts on this method?