Voted
Which version of Chess.com do you like, V3 or V2? Vote now!

Wow, v2 is killing v3 in this poll.
As happens in USA elections, the folks votes for A (V2), but the congressmen (chess.com staff) votes for B (V3).

v2. The computer analysis is stronger, it is easier to insert games in messages, if you are trying to analyse a game from a thematic tournament, the pgn doesn't include the opening moves and you have to add them manually. I could go on.

Wow, v2 is killing v3 in this poll.
As happens in USA elections, the folks votes for A (V2), but the congressmen (chess.com staff) votes for B (V3).
Chess.com is a business and an informal vote isn't something that is likely to sway anything. A poll taken on site, that is harder to game, and not a forum, would be better.
Though, even then, the site has access to actual usage data. They can see how many people voluntarily switch to v2, how many new members, average session lengths, etc. That is real data that will tell the site if people care for v3.

my alternative poll roughly 60_40% V2 leading after 50 votes 3 disqualified rule infractions.All v3
see V3 v V2
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/v3-v-v2

I also made a similar poll:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/poll-do-you-like-v3-as-it-currently-stands

my alternative poll roughly 60_40% V2 leading after 50 votes 3 disqualified rule infractions.All v3
see V3 v V2
A rule you made after the fact.

as my middle name isn't 'gallop' I,m seeking an impartial representation.I,m not towing the party line/lies.Where as the 'express poll' is Chess.com biased and despite that V2 is winning hands down.
I,m expecting dawn raids and round ups any day.
Also I stated from get go multiple voters would be eliminated ,can Express say the same .?The only amendment was to disqualify 'staff 'voting as they clearly don't fit the impartial criteria.

Whatever you say. Staff are members too and their preference is just as valid. But, your forum, your rules.
Also, no staff members voted. Moderators aren't staff.
And I read your topic when it first started and there was no staff can't vote rule. Though. Ultimately it doesn't matter. Staff has access to better metrics on how many people chose to use v2.

Most moderators are regular members that staff think would be good at helping answer questions and assist with forum/chat/content moderation. They are not paid by the site and are users and members of the site, just like you.
It's not like their job is on the line if they don't like something.
Staff members also can moderate, but in general, moderators are not staff, regardless of the icon in v2 (which is just something to do with v3 anyway). The difference in icon can be seen in v3.
Voted. (V2)