Carlsen. Duh?
who has deeper chess understanding
Sort:
Carlsen
you guys think carlsen has more chess understanding then aronian?
Yeah. Who has deeper chess understanding than us?
How could we possibly judge? None of us is strong enough to know how deep their understanding goes.
bu,mp
A 2-hour bump? No come on, that's gotta be an infraction...
AndyClifton wrote:
A 2-hour bump? No come on, that's gotta be an infraction...
cause you didnt answer it
if aronian played magnus style he could be just as strong as him
I think Aronian's understanding is about 9.81 (+/- 5), and Carlsen's is about 10.05 (+/- 5), so Carlsen's is a tiny bit deeper.
superking500 wrote:
AndyClifton wrote:
A 2-hour bump? No come on, that's gotta be an infraction...
cause you didnt answer it
if aronian played magnus style he could be just as strong as him
That's just your opinion. IMO right now Magnus>Kramnik>Vishy>Aronian, but of course that's just my opinion, which is just as valid (or invalid) as yours.
macer75 wrote:
superking500 wrote:
AndyClifton wrote:
A 2-hour bump? No come on, that's gotta be an infraction...
cause you didnt answer it
if aronian played magnus style he could be just as strong as him
That's just your opinion. IMO right now Magnus>Kramnik>Vishy>Aronian, but of course that's just my opinion, which is just as valid (or invalid) as yours.
is it cause magnus is stronger then everyone else, or is it his style... he plays it safe, and plays good moves...... what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?
superking500 wrote:
macer75 wrote:
superking500 wrote:
AndyClifton wrote:
A 2-hour bump? No come on, that's gotta be an infraction...
cause you didnt answer it
if aronian played magnus style he could be just as strong as him
That's just your opinion. IMO right now Magnus>Kramnik>Vishy>Aronian, but of course that's just my opinion, which is just as valid (or invalid) as yours.
is it cause magnus is stronger then everyone else, or is it his style... he plays it safe, and plays good moves...... what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?
Ok... so Magnus is strong because he plays good moves? That makes sense. The rest of that you probably want to explain in greater detail.
superking500 wrote:
what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?
You mean the Really Really Strong Style? lol
kco wrote:
I'll say Kasparov.
Yeah, but you also want to eliminate world leaders!
AndyClifton wrote:
superking500 wrote:
what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?
You mean the Really Really Strong Style? lol
yes for example aronian tends to play complex middle games....which is why he loses more then magnus....what if he played like magnus's style...he would be just as good as him
magnus tends to play more simple posistions
Nov 24, 2013
0
#19
AndyClifton wrote:
kco wrote:
I'll say Kasparov.
Yeah, but you also want to eliminate world leaders!
Firstly he got to be elected then we eliminate him !
superking500 wrote:
AndyClifton wrote:
superking500 wrote:
what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?
You mean the Really Really Strong Style? lol
yes for example aronian tends to play complex middle games....which is why he loses more then magnus....what if he played like magnus's style...he would be just as good as him
magnus tends to play more simple posistions
When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?
carlsen or aronian