Yeah, so because he lost 8.5 - 6.5 to Kramnik (one of the top players of recent times) without winning a game, we should ignore all his successful defenses. Ignore that he was ranked no.1 for 20 years. Ignore all the records he still holds.
The post doesn't merit any argument. Wether you agree that he was the greatest off all time or no, to say he shouldn't even be on the list of possibles, for this reason alone, is just stupidity.
Indeed, Fischer lost every single match against Karpov in just his second WC match.
Yeah, so because he lost 8.5 - 6.5 to Kramnik (one of the top players of recent times) without winning a game, we should ignore all his successful defenses. Ignore that he was ranked no.1 for 20 years. Ignore all the records he still holds.
The post doesn't merit any argument. Wether you agree that he was the greatest off all time or no, to say he shouldn't even be on the list of possibles, for this reason alone, is just stupidity.