BorgQueen wrote:
I don't have time to analyse your game right now... maybe later tonight or tomorrow I can.
Its okay Borg, take your time.
who's the clown?
Sort:
BorgQueen wrote:
Yahhooo!!!, I'm improving, thanks Borg.
Note the captial I in I'm and the apostrophe denoting the missing letters in "I am".
No need to apologise, just keep at it and you will get there, so long as you don't get bogged down with one confusing expression ;-)
Thanks Borg.
I think i finally got it Borg. The meaning of ''strategic position'' is ''a position base on strategy''. So,i'm right or wrong Borg?. I'll wait again borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
Close enough!
Technically:
a position based on strategy
Thank's Borg.
So, you mean i am right exept i forgot to add the letter ''D'' to the word ''base'' Borg?.
I'll wait again to your response Borg.
Yahhooo, i finally got it, the meaning of the words ''strategic position'' is ''a position based on strategy''.
So, you mean Borg, that if somebody gonna ask me where i am gonna position my pieces?, can i answer him or her like this ''it depends of my strategy''?.
BorgQueen wrote:
Correct :-)
Thank's a lot Borg.
But lol, i learn it after 4 years of studying the words. I'm like i took a 4 years engineering course.
BorgQueen wrote:
Interesting... you could have cut down 4 years of posts if you had just asked the right question!
Can you re-phrase "strategic position" to use the word "strategy" !!
lol
Glad we got there.
Now here's a test:
What does "strategic idea" mean?
Aaaaah....... an idea based on strategy?.
BorgQueen wrote:
Spot on!!
What is a "logical move"?
Spot on?, you mean i am right Borg?.
Aaaahh........a strategic move?.
BorgQueen wrote:
Yes you were right.
A logical move is a move based on logic!
Getting it?
Yes!!, i am right, thank's Borg .
Yes Borg, i got it. So, can say ''tactical weapon'' is ''a weapon based on tactics''?. I'll wait again Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
Yes, although I've never heard of a tactical weapon :-P
Thank's Borg, i just heard that in the movie ''executive decision''.
I forgot to ask you something about our king gambit game before Borg. If you remember what you said before, when your knight in h4 are not in strategic position, so, you decided to put it back this knight in g6, so that you can put it again this knight in strategic position or so that it can in line in this knight in your strategy right?. So, my question is, and think for me, that even you decided to put it back this knight in g6, it's still can't get into strategic position or it can in line it in your strategy again, because this knight is too far to my king and too far for you to checkmate me. So, i'm i right or wrong Borg?. I'll wait again Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
I don't understand the question.
I don't remember having a knight on g6. Nor on h4.
My knight on f6 went to h5 and then g3 because it wasn't doing much but blocking my queen. That very same knight was strategically well positioned. It never went "back". It was instrumental in winning your bishop on e2. It then gobbled the rook on f1 and even ended up delivering the checkmate.
The knight was a monster for you to deal with.
Now... what was your question?!
Oh, yeah, my mistake Borg.
Ok, so, you mean for you, even your knight was in g3 and blocking your queen, is is still in strategic position or it is still in line in your strategy Borg?.
BorgQueen wrote:
The knight was blocking my queen's lateral (sideways) power. By moving it to h5->g3, it obtained a strong position and allowed my queen back into the game. In that regard it was in line with my strategy :-)
Oh!, i'm sorry Borg, my last question was wrong again.
Ok, when you knight are still in f6, did you mean that your knight are still in strategic position or it is still in line in your strategy even though it blocking your queen Borg?. If your answer is yes, can you explain to me why?.
You said in your post above that your knight in h5 and g3, it obtained a strong position and allowed your queen back in to the game right Borg?. So, my question is ''how this was got in line in your strategy''?, and ''what is your strategy''?.
Do you have a time now Borg, to analyze my game in my post 144?.
So, you are a solftware developer right Borg?. So my question is ''is this job of yours is the same as software designer''?. If your answer is yes ''is this means that your company have an engineer too, to work out with your software to make it durable?. I'll wait again to your response Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
No. My knight was not in line... as I said during the game and as you already know, it was doing nothing but blocking my queen, which is why I redirected it to g3.
By redirecting it to g3, my queen was freed and my knight obtained a strong position.
My strategy was simply to place my pieces well to give them strength and then look for ways to attack you.
No, I don't I am off to chess club tonight, so I can't analyse your game right now.
Yes, my business designs and develops business applications. I have no "engineer". If you like, Microsoft acts as my engineer.
Thank's Borg.
So, mean that your knight was not in strategic position when it was in f6 Borg?.
Wow!, your strategy was good Borg.
It's ok Borg, i can still wait to you to analyst my game.
Wow!, you have a good business Borg. I wish you can hire me as your assistance, you know?, just carrying all your staff, where ever you go.
BorgQueen wrote:
Yes you were right.
A logical move is a move based on logic!
Getting it?
Wait a minute Borg. How about if i say ''strategic plan''?, so,is this means, it's ''a plan based on strategy?. I'll wait again Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
taots_11 wrote:
So, mean that your knight was not in strategic position when it was in f6 Borg?.
So, mean that your knight was not in strategic position when it was in f6 Borg?.
Wow!, your strategy was good Borg.
It's ok Borg, i can still wait to you to analyst my game.
Wow!, you have a good business Borg. I wish you can hire me as your assistance, you know?, just carrying all your staff, where ever you go.
Correct. AGAIN, on f6 it wasn't doing anything helpful and it was blocking my queen. How many times do I have to say the same thing?! Read more carefully!
taots_11 wrote:
Wait a minute Borg. How about if i say ''strategic plan''?, so,is this means, it's ''a plan based on strategy?. I'll wait again Borg.
Correct.
Thank's Borg.
I'm sorry Borg, if i didn't read it carefully.
I'm glad that i'm right that the meaning of words ''strategic plan'' is ''a plan based on strategy Borg. But i'm getting confuse again, because if you remember before that you said that a word ''plan'' and a word ''strategy'' have the same meaning right?. So, is this means that the meaning of the words ''strategic plan'' is ''a plan based on plan Borg?, i know this is sounds not right, but i have to know why this is not right Borg?.
And i have a new question to you Borg. My question is ''is the words strategic position or a position based on strategy and the words a position according to the strategy have the same meaning?. I'll wait again Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
Thanks for analyzing my game Borg. So, what do you think about my style?, am i a tactical player?, or a positional player?.
BorgQueen wrote:
Neither a, b or c work for me.
The position has to have an underlying essence of strategy. That is what "strategic" means.
"Strategy based position" works. "Strategic position" works.
Why are you trying so hard to change it?
I have a question again in your post above Borg. You said in your post above that ''the position has to have an underlying essence of strategy'' right?, so my question is ''what is gonna happen if the position have no underlying essence of strategy?.I'll wait again Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
1. Even you suggested that there is a difference between plan (overall, unchanging) and strategy (adaptive, it's goal is to achieve the plan).
2. I'd have to say tactical.
3. Then it is a position and not a strategic position.
Thanks Borg.
I have 3 questions again to you Borg.
1.I know now that the meaning of the words ''strategic position'' is a position based on strategy right Borg?. So my question is '' is the words a position based on strategy and a position according to the strategy have the same meaning'' ?.
2.I notice that your analyzation to my game, is you always suggested that i have to developed first my pieces or i have to strategically position my pieces first and i should be position my pieces to get in line to my strategy right Borg?, but i didn't developed or strategically position my pieces and it is not in line with my strategy right?, so my question is '' why i won the game, even though i didn't follow your suggestion Borg?.
3.you said Borg that i am a tactical player right?, so my question is ''why i am not a positional player?. I'll wait again Borg.
BorgQueen wrote:
1. More or less, yes.
2. Because your opponent made more mistakes than you did.
3. Because you need to ask the question. If you were a positional player, you would know it. You are a tactical player because you understand tactics more than positioning.
1.I knew it!, thanks Borg.
2.Oh!, i see.
3.Oh!, i thought i'm a positional player Borg. So this means, even i'm a good tactician, i still, can't be a NM, because i'm sure i can't beat a positional player, isn't Borg?. Ok, can you give me an example in my game, why i'm a tactical player Borg?, because i didn't see any tactics that i have done in game.
BorgQueen wrote:
Move 32. Qa2+ is a tactical blow, winning a piece.
Thanks Borg.
1.So you mean Borg, that i strategically position my queen in C2 before i did to move it to A2?.
2.So you mean too Borg, that i never did a positional move in my game, because i'm only a tactician and not a positional player?. If your answer is no, can you give me an example of positional move that i did in my game?.
BorgQueen wrote:
In chess, strategic positioning has a slightly different meaning to me than general strategic position, which you have been trying to define for years.
In the classic sense, strategic positioning is positioning your assets in such a way as to aide in the strategic plan. In other words you get to choose exactly where you place your forces. In chess, however, there are too many obstacles to place things exactly where you want them.
Classic strategic positioning of forces, applied to a chessboard:
However, in chess, this is just not possible. You have to counter your opponents threats, obey chess rules like keeping the bishops on their diagonals and not moving pawns to exactly where you want them, but obey the movement rules.
So you can't just position your pieces in line with your strategy of "attack and win the king".
You didn't strategically position your queen on c2. It would have worked on other squares as well... it just happened to be in the right place at the right time as a result of retreating from your tactical blow of capturing on g6.
Every half decent player has a tactical aspect and a positional aspect. Of course you played positional moves. A move can be both strategic AND tactical -- playing a tactic out to achieve not material, but positional advantage can be achieved.
Bd3 was a positional move... as was your eventual e4.
In chess, strategic play IS positional play.
Thanks Borg.
I thought i already know what is the meaning of the words ''strategic position'' Borg, but the truth is, i didn't know huh?.
I'm sorry to tell you that your first example for me above was still so obscure to me Borg.
1.For me ''strategically position'' and ''strategic position'' is the same Borg. So my question is ''what do you mean that for you there is a slightly difference between the two?, i mean, can you give me an another example of what that slightly difference are you talking about''?.
Good game of mine Borg. I play white, My opponent play black.I think, I strategically position all my pieces, Thats why i win the game Borg. What do you think Borg?.
No capitals after a comma. Always two spaces after a full stop. One space after a comma.
But you are improving!
Yahhooo!!!, im improving, thanks Borg.