In the old descriptive notation both N and Kt were allowed. Why only N in algebraic (i.e. why don't write Ktg1-f3 etc.)?
I think it's too easy to get it confused with K for king. N is descriptive enough that you know what it is, since the K in "knight" is silent.
You're the only exception, we call you kay instead of n
N is quicker to write and understand
N is one letter. K is taken.
In the old descriptive notation both N and Kt were allowed. Why only N in algebraic (i.e. why don't write Ktg1-f3 etc.)?