When people cannot attack the argument they attack the person. Be nice!
Black queen to h1+ only delays the imminent Qg7# by one move, if rook on b2 is not moved to b7...the only good move for black. Remember that it is black's move, which faces certain checkmate in the next move. In the game, if my critics here plied the back queen on c6 to deliver a check on h1 to my king, I would immediately capture his queen with impunity then mate him freely in the next move. If this explanation is not clear, I encourage you to set up the pieces on a physical board and play the moves.
Black queen on h1 becomes a hanging piece. Why would you not use the white king to capture the black queen if it were moved to h1?
PS. I won the first game against the Indonesian master because the unorthodox approach I used surprised him (and me!). He cleaned me up in the second game. By then he had my number. I declined his enthusiastic request for a third game, realizing he was a much stronger player. We both had a good laugh.
Not buying.
Have you ever actually played a master repeatedly? I have. I played a 2206 newly minted NM master for hours on end in casual games (in 1986). I lost every single game . The best I could get out of him was "hmmm, novelty" in one game. This was someone rated about 500-600 points higher than I at the time. The chess champion of Indonesia would be *at least* an IM...are you Class A or Expert? Then you would suffer the same.
Casual players do not "surprise" national champions. You didn't have a good laugh about it. He was a fraud, or you are. Given this:
Psychophysiologist, Bible translator and flamenco music composer.
...I'm guessing it's you .
Giving check all the way to mate.