Why Are Women Inferior In Chess?
Sort:
Tracking, because it's just so much fun watching KaosKid get blasted.
chesster3145 wrote:
Tracking, because it's just so much fun watching KaosKid get blasted.
Come on, dude. Who's getting blasted? The world needs more REAL MEN, not men who run after women.
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish". - one liner!
Sep 2, 2016
0
#24
You are just wrong. Not sure if this was intended as a trolling post or not. But you are just wrong. They aren't. Women ARE NOT inferior in chess.
There weren't women in teaching until there were.
There weren't women in medicine until there were.
There weren't women in business until there were.
There weren't women in computer science until there were.
Women are just beginning to break into chess. They aren't inferior. 100 years ago you might have asked, "why are women inferior in teaching?" Now most teachers are women. 100 years from now who knows what the situation in chess will be.
KaosKid wrote:
chesster3145 wrote:
Tracking, because it's just so much fun watching KaosKid get blasted.
Come on, dude. Who's getting blasted? The world needs more REAL MEN, not men who run after women.
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish". - one liner!
"Don't argue with a stupid person. He'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience."
iswarprasaddeuri wrote:
even our god krishna had thousands of wife and he always ran after woman
Get your facts and your English straight.
KaosKid wrote:
chesster3145 wrote:
Tracking, because it's just so much fun watching KaosKid get blasted.
Come on, dude. Who's getting blasted? The world needs more REAL MEN, not men who run after women.
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish". - one liner!
note the real men vacant expression and his delicious dinner
noodleFueled wrote:
You are just wrong. Not sure if this was intended as a trolling post or not. But you are just wrong. They aren't. Women ARE NOT inferior in chess.
There weren't women in teaching until there were.
There weren't women in medicine until there were.
There weren't women in business until there were.
There weren't women in computer science until there were.
Women are just beginning to break into chess. They aren't inferior. 100 years ago you might have asked, "why are women inferior in teaching?" Now most teachers are women. 100 years from now who knows what the situation in chess will be.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/chess/11548840/Nigel-Short-Girls-just-dont-have-the-brains-to-play-chess.html
People like you are the reason why.
Sep 2, 2016
0
#32
KaosKid wrote:
noodleFueled wrote:
You are just wrong. Not sure if this was intended as a trolling post or not. But you are just wrong. They aren't. Women ARE NOT inferior in chess.
There weren't women in teaching until there were.
There weren't women in medicine until there were.
There weren't women in business until there were.
There weren't women in computer science until there were.
Women are just beginning to break into chess. They aren't inferior. 100 years ago you might have asked, "why are women inferior in teaching?" Now most teachers are women. 100 years from now who knows what the situation in chess will be.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/chess/11548840/Nigel-Short-Girls-just-dont-have-the-brains-to-play-chess.html
Oh right, totally forgot that Short and Polgar have PhDs in cognitive science. Being an expert in chess doesn't make you an expert in thinking.
Bobby Fischer might be the quintessential example.
noodleFueled wrote:
You are just wrong. Not sure if this was intended as a trolling post or not. But you are just wrong. They aren't. Women ARE NOT inferior in chess.
There weren't women in teaching until there were.
There weren't women in medicine until there were.
There weren't women in business until there were.
There weren't women in computer science until there were.
Women are just beginning to break into chess. They aren't inferior. 100 years ago you might have asked, "why are women inferior in teaching?" Now most teachers are women. 100 years from now who knows what the situation in chess will be.
Thats just plain mean.
noodleFueled wrote:
KaosKid wrote:
noodleFueled wrote:
You are just wrong. Not sure if this was intended as a trolling post or not. But you are just wrong. They aren't. Women ARE NOT inferior in chess.
There weren't women in teaching until there were.
There weren't women in medicine until there were.
There weren't women in business until there were.
There weren't women in computer science until there were.
Women are just beginning to break into chess. They aren't inferior. 100 years ago you might have asked, "why are women inferior in teaching?" Now most teachers are women. 100 years from now who knows what the situation in chess will be.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/chess/11548840/Nigel-Short-Girls-just-dont-have-the-brains-to-play-chess.html
Oh right, totally forgot that Short and Polgar have PhDs in cognitive science. Being an expert in chess doesn't make you an expert in thinking.
Bobby Fischer might be the quintessential example.
You don't need a PHD in cognitive science to see that women( and girls) are nowhere near men (and boys) when it comes to chess. Take the current Olympiad, for example. Hope that is enough for you to understand.
monsieur noodle. don't get sucked into a headline. the OP is Trolling oc. he wants to upset and insult people. and Facts about this story was rehashed in at Least 3 Very Long posts after short spoke. why go over it again? spend the next hour reading all the long posts; its easy to find.
so Mr Macho man, question- clearly Not the ladies man, are you planning to be single all of your long life? are you as obnoxious irl about women?
How to start a flame war anywhere on the internet:
- Ask why X group of people is inferior to Y group of people in Z thing
- Done.
Seriously, one of the main rules of the internet is to not add to flame wars.
yep.
and one of the best things most of us could do is to avoid old worn out discussions.
if the troll really want to bring up Short, he should have to bump the thread.
not rehashing a thousand post discussion here.
Sep 2, 2016
0
#39
Nigel Short:
Claims women don't have the brains to play chess.
Gets destroyed by Judit Polgar nearly every time he plays her.
she won a lot of games and shattered a lot of expectations. its very old news but I still like how Kaspy cheated to avoid being beaten. (shows that even a great chess player like him can be jerk about the issue).
unfortunately though. mr OP doesn't kare about polgar. he's still cat-calling the women. 
this isn't about chess-its about trolling on a friday...