It's because it's very easy for beginners to go wrong.
As I said in another thread - Wayward Queen is the chess equivalent of griefing noobs in an MMO, and the people that use it have the same lack of character.
It's because it's very easy for beginners to go wrong.
Doesn’t Bxh6 lose for black?
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
It’s bad though.
Absolutely wrong.
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
Maybe in bullet, but not rapid.
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
How are you 2000?
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
All of your games are super fast blitz. They're absolute chaos and the eval bar has a stroke in every one of them. You touched rapid once and left it in the dust. The only thing your games tell me is that you have good internet and a nice mouse, not that the wayward queen attack is good.
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
All of your games are super fast blitz. They're absolute chaos and the eval bar has a stroke in every one of them. You touched rapid once and left it in the dust. The only thing your games tell me is that you have good internet and a nice mouse, not that the wayward queen attack is good.
said the person whose rating is 800.
LOL. If you want to talk with me about ratings, it's definitely a bad idea.
I used this opening in official tourneys, with some success. And I'm sure of what I tell you, this opening is not bad if you know how to play it.
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
All of your games are super fast blitz. They're absolute chaos and the eval bar has a stroke in every one of them. You touched rapid once and left it in the dust. The only thing your games tell me is that you have good internet and a nice mouse, not that the wayward queen attack is good.
said the person whose rating is 800.
LOL.
I used this opening in official tourneys, with some success. And I'm sure of what I tell you, this opening is not bad if you know how to play it.
In bullet?
The quick brown fox, who loves wayward openings
After e4 e5 I usually play Qh5 because it's a good and reasonable opening.
If you don't believe me, you can check my games.
All you need is how to play it.
By the way, Kf3 is a cowardly and boring move.
All of your games are super fast blitz. They're absolute chaos and the eval bar has a stroke in every one of them. You touched rapid once and left it in the dust. The only thing your games tell me is that you have good internet and a nice mouse, not that the wayward queen attack is good.
said the person whose rating is 800.
LOL. If you want to talk with me about ratings, it's definitely a bad idea.
I used this opening in official tourneys, with some success. And I'm sure of what I tell you, this opening is not bad if you know how to play it.
Yeah, my bullet rating is 800 because I've never touched it. I rarely play blitz too, because why would I? I'm still learning. My actual rating is 1000, and you're blatantly trying to misrepresent me. Why did you bring ratings up anyway? I never mentioned them once, nor are they important to the conversation.
So how do you play the wayward queen then? Have your scholar's mate fail, then waste time going back to f3 in an attempt to continue the attack against 2000 rated opponents? If they block with the knight, then your queen just looks stupid and is blocking the knight. If the queens get traded, you just wasted all that time moving the queen, only for it to be off the board with the opponent having a developmental lead.
What's good about that?
I guess they are hoping for a blunder or a mouseslip? Not objectively terrible, but not good either(-0.3)
I usually find it confusing that why people use Wayward Queen Attack. I had made a blog post about it (Link will be given). It gives the player a disadvantage to develop pieces as the Queen would be on constant risk and you have to keep playing with Queen. For example, I had played a game where my opponent white had used Wayward Queen Attack against me.
He resigned after this. I had missed several good moves I think but I won.
So yeah. I don't know why players even play this move. My personal favourite is Giuoco Piano. Just develop your pieces and control the center.
My blog : https://www.chess.com/blog/The_Arrow_Of_Requiem/beginners-guide-part-1-the-wayward-queen-attack
Yeah thats it.